Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(45,848 posts)
31. Vance can't single-handedly invoke the 25th amendment.
Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:15 AM
Nov 1

He'd need a majority of the Cabinet, and that's unlikely since Trump would undoubtedly get wind of the plot and would fire disloyal cabinet members before they had a chance to act. And even if somehow Vance could marshal the support of a majority of Cabinet, Trump could simply send a letter to the House and Senate saying he isn't unable to perform the duties of the Office and he would resume the powers of the Office. While Vance and a majority of the Cabinet could then reiterate the claim that Trump is unable to perform the duties of the Office, as a practical matter, the moment Trump resumed office could fire every Cabinet member that sided with Vance. Finally, if it got that far, it would take a vote of 2/3 of both the House and Senate to remove Trump permanently -- a higher bar than impeaching and convicting him.

In short, so long as Trump is not unconscious, it's unlikely the 25th can successfully be invoked against him.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Heavy sigh UT_democrat Oct 31 #1
Those are not easy comparisons Renew Deal Oct 31 #2
Unfortunately there are men that usually vote democratic JI7 Oct 31 #3
I really don't see Vance at the top of a 28 ticket stopdiggin Oct 31 #4
He won't be the GOP nominee Fiendish Thingy Oct 31 #11
If they can destroy MAGA, yeah it'd be Cheney leftstreet Oct 31 #12
Maybe Kemp over Cheney in that non MAGA scenario Celerity Nov 1 #33
+1 leftstreet Nov 1 #34
Depends on whether trump annoints him, or whether Vance pulls an Amendment 22 coup before 2028. Silent Type Oct 31 #17
won't matter. (Trump's 'endorsements' have done surprisingly little ... ) stopdiggin Oct 31 #22
What is an Amendment 22 coup? onenote Oct 31 #28
25th. Typo, sorry. Won't correct it because I think most folks will get it. Silent Type Nov 1 #30
Vance can't single-handedly invoke the 25th amendment. onenote Nov 1 #31
He can get a majority of cabinet members to follow him. Jesus Christ, these people will walk over trump when Silent Type Nov 1 #32
It's early but imho it's Newsom's nomination if he wants it. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 31 #5
Oh, lord! bigmonk Oct 31 #6
You go to the polls with the electorate you have, not the electorate you might want or RockRaven Oct 31 #7
preach it! no seriously - the delusional needs to be beaten back into the corner .. stopdiggin Oct 31 #18
"BUt hE cAnT WiN tHe rUsT bElT" BannonsLiver Oct 31 #8
I'm afraid that's a conventional wisdom - widely shared stopdiggin Oct 31 #16
Meh BannonsLiver Oct 31 #24
There are still swing states? And those that are - nobody's idea .. ? stopdiggin Oct 31 #29
I am as a liberal/democratic as they come bob4460 Oct 31 #9
Neither will be the nominee in 2028 Fiendish Thingy Oct 31 #10
Is that basically your F5 key at this point? BannonsLiver Oct 31 #25
How about . . . Scubamatt Oct 31 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Oct 31 #23
It's 2025. nt Gore1FL Oct 31 #14
AOC would have a 0% chance of winning the electoral college rollin74 Oct 31 #15
WAY too early. beaglelover Oct 31 #19
A white heterosexual man with hair performs better nationally than a Latino woman Prairie Gates Oct 31 #20
I'm glad that Newsom is polling ahead of Vance. Fortunately, Vance is fairly low bar to begin with. QueerDuck Oct 31 #21
Sadly, this country doesn't think women are smart, strong or capable. Bread and Circuses Oct 31 #26
They drooled over room temperature IQ Palin leftstreet Nov 1 #35
Too early for it to mean anything at all NoRethugFriends Oct 31 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #31