Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(531 posts)
4. Given that's what the evidence supports yes that is easier to believe
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 09:19 AM
Yesterday

Why have none of the people on the campaign especially the ones focused on protecting voting not bought into this? Why are Democrats in the states like Pennsylvania, like North Carolina not buying into this?

The evidence doesn't support the author's conclusions. It's all poorly informed suppositions.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Has anyone contacted Sidney Powell? She would be a perfect fit for this "movement"! tritsofme Yesterday #1
Sure tintinvotes Yesterday #2
Nice parry... Hugin Yesterday #3
Given that's what the evidence supports yes that is easier to believe EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #4
The biggest harm in this conspiracy theory is that it makes citizens even more apathetic Ponietz Yesterday #9
2000? Perfect example. stillcool Yesterday #37
Sorry, 2000 was a typo -- should have been 2020 Ponietz Yesterday #41
I remember in 2015 when people said the same Hornedfrog2000 Yesterday #40
Russian influence was pretty clear to me then Ponietz Yesterday #42
Poorly informed suppositions? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #22
The Brennan Center has answers for you stillcool Yesterday #29
What do you mean "Not something even Obama did"? Self Esteem Yesterday #7
There were numerous bomb threats on election day IbogaProject Yesterday #8
Real experts, with actual credibility, like Marc Elias say there was no fraud tritsofme Yesterday #12
I think the world of Marc Elias. I contribute to him every month. But here is where he is totally wrong. BComplex Yesterday #16
Except he is not wrong, he just wasn't fooled by delusional conspiracy theories. tritsofme Yesterday #24
Except you have no evidence, just theories Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #21
No. Trump told us they stole it. BComplex Yesterday #27
Nope, that's not evidence Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #38
and you consider those wild (and essentially meaningless) ramblings - to somehow be ... stopdiggin Yesterday #43
The bomb threats were a real issue but certainly not one that decided the election. Self Esteem 22 hrs ago #60
The more than three and a half million voters... Chemical Bill 17 hrs ago #61
This claim just doesn't stand to scrutiny. Self Esteem 17 hrs ago #62
EAC tests voting equipment on a regular basis -- the changes were de minimis cadoman Yesterday #5
This is my summary - Tbone421 Yesterday #6
Thiel has connections to Triplite and Palantir, Soros has connections to Dominion and Smartmatic cadoman Yesterday #19
Marjorie Greene is an investor in Palantir. Initech Yesterday #58
Kooky CT nonsense. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #20
I hear you angrychair Yesterday #26
Bullshit. Your statement is 100% false. Wiz Imp Yesterday #30
Of all the people that post theories, etc lapfog_1 Yesterday #34
Very much agreed Metaphorical Yesterday #52
Leonard Leo, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel ... had it all ready to go. Btw Ohio's 2024 Senate race was dirty too. Botany Yesterday #10
Then why did Musk spend several hundred million on getting the vote out for Trump? Doodley Yesterday #32
Because he was compiling a tranche of voters that could be "called in" as needed. Botany Yesterday #36
Ivanka got EVMs as part of a deal with China Blue Full Moon Yesterday #11
Thank dog most people don't buy this conspiracy theory. We lost, now let's focus on primaries. Silent Type Yesterday #13
Sure 1 in 76 million is such a nothing stat. Botany Yesterday #15
Show your math Mountainguy 22 hrs ago #59
Well it's already got 40 recs Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #18
Sailed, horizon, long gone Sympthsical Yesterday #53
So true, and so sad. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #56
This election was TOTALLY rigged by the crypto-loving silicon valley billionaires and the Leonard Leos of the world. BComplex Yesterday #14
So you're accusing Democrats like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden of being complicit in the cover-up of a "stolen election"? tritsofme Yesterday #28
Ridiculous and delusional? You're treading really close to something that's against the rules here... BComplex Yesterday #46
Accusing Kamala Harris and Joe Biden of intentionally covering up a "stolen election" is ridiculous and delusional tritsofme Yesterday #47
Election denialism does not help Democrats win future elections. Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #17
Statistical analysis shows manipulation angryxyouth Yesterday #49
Have you contacted the CyberNinjas yet? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #50
Dr. Mebane is hardly Cyber Ninjas angryxyouth 5 hrs ago #64
So I presume Jackson and Mebane will be introducing their "evidence" in court? Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #65
Dr. Mebane's work is being sited angryxyouth 40 min ago #71
So, the answer is no, at least not yet Fiendish Thingy 34 min ago #72
He did something with his pal of the moment, Musk Joinfortmill Yesterday #23
Been trying to show data for a month angryxyouth Yesterday #25
Why did Trump win in all swing states? How about they had a better machine to get the vote out? Doodley Yesterday #31
this is a danger of living in a bubble/echo chamber AlexSFCA Yesterday #33
yeah...it's not like the American people stillcool Yesterday #39
The protesters are at best a few percent of the population. They don't reflect how many people voted Kamala or Trump. Doodley Yesterday #44
This message was self-deleted by its author stillcool Yesterday #45
If you actually believe she lost ALL of the seven swing states, valleyrogue 4 hrs ago #67
Will you be selling a bridge to Kamala Harris? She doesn't buy into these nonsense conspiracy theories. tritsofme 4 hrs ago #69
Rockland county mean nothing Historic NY Yesterday #35
If what you say is true, if the chain of custody was tight then a hand count would prove it questionseverything Yesterday #55
Nonsense. this is just more 'mighta', 'coulda', 'kinda', stuff stopdiggin Yesterday #48
What are the odds valleyrogue 4 hrs ago #68
Democrats showed a deplorable level of interest (and commitment) stopdiggin 4 hrs ago #70
I knew something was wrong. Initech Yesterday #51
Me too mvd Yesterday #54
Then why did polls show him either leading or within a point in every swing state? Polybius Yesterday #57
Kick n/t babydollhead 9 hrs ago #63
There is no way in hell she lost ALL the "swing" states. valleyrogue 4 hrs ago #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»She Won -- article on rig...»Reply #4