Elizabeth Warren
In reply to the discussion: Boston Globe Op Ed: Elizabeth Warren, run for the White House [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I do think your 'motives are impure' in what you wrote here - otherwise you would have addressed the substance of the OP, rather than simply, out of the gate, pulling up the author's biographical info 'just to let the readers know'. You might not 'hate' Warren - after all I don't 'hate' Clinton. You might even love for her to be a Senator. But what you brought to the debate today was a deliberate attempt to discredit a posting in favour of her for President, by making sure everyone knew the author was likely to have a personal bias. Which, as you yourself note, is hardly surprising, because, after all, they wrote a positive article about such. So there was no need to come in and 'make sure everyone knew' what else the author does. Feel free to call that a scolding - I give them out when I see someone being disingenuous.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):