Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
9. I have to disagree strongly.
Thu May 9, 2013, 01:34 AM
May 2013

It is not about whether it is 'good' or 'bad' as I or others may consider Augustine 'bad' and Nietzsche 'good'.

Ayn Rand was simply not a philosopher. She was a hack fiction writer who cobbled together a tirade based on her narcissism and called it 'philosophy'. L. Ron Hubbard was no more a theologian or great wise man either just because he started a 'religion' that is really just a money cult.

Try going to any philosophy department in a college or university and finding a class or the allowing of Ayn Rand within a class on modern philosophy. I know of one instance and it is a Koch funded Objectivist at the University of Texas who received millions through BT&T Bank to 'promote' objectivism in their philosophy department.

So, no, as a graduate with a philosophy degree, I won't be accepting her pablum into the Canon of Philosophy....ever.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Philosophy»This message was self-del...»Reply #9