Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeye_Democrat

(15,332 posts)
7. Interesting!
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 12:34 AM
Jan 2017

Clinton would have won the electoral college if ALL states allocated their electors proportionally too, of course!

If we're going to keep the damn electoral college, that seems like a sensible way to do it!

I did the calculations just for sh*ts and giggles a few days after the election, mostly to see how close proportional electoral allocation came to the popular vote, percentage-wise. (The popular vote totals have since been updated because of slow counts.) Not that it really matters, but Clinton had an even bigger percentage gap among proportional electors than she did the popular vote! At least at that time. EDIT: It was very nearly the same, though! Not a big difference at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does anyone know about t...»Reply #7