2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 538: Voters really did switch to Trump at the last minute [View all]zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)The classic problem in the use of statistics for single events is that it is a logical fallacy that statistics have anything to do with the outcome of a single event. We know the statistical probability of flipping a coin, but just because it comes up heads once in a while doesn't mean the predictions for tails was wrong.
In other words, the problem is with the reader. Everyone should have been concerned when her chances were falling. When they fell below 60%, there was a real reason to worry. More importantly, when she "only" had 44% of nominal support, that left a lot of room for things to "break" his way. When you have 49%, it's hard to lose. I got concerned when she fell to 55% but never thought he could win that many Midwestern states. And he barely did. The flip side is that the basic reason he won one of them, is why he won more.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):