Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drug Policy

saras

(6,670 posts)

1. Is there any science at all supporting that number? or any number?

Reply to Skip_In_Boulder (Original post)

Thu Apr 5, 2012, 10:58 PM

Apr 2012

We've managed to go a hundred years with marijuana while consistently refusing to do good science on it. I'd be surprised if there was a radical change right now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Medical marijuana: THC driving limits sponsor voted for one standard, prefers different one [View all] Skip_In_Boulder Apr 2012 OP

Is there any science at all supporting that number? or any number? saras Apr 2012 #1

I don't know but that is what I am currently researching Skip_In_Boulder Apr 2012 #2

I've been following maps.org for a long time. Good research is HARD saras Apr 2012 #3