Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: More public schools splitting up boys, girls [View all]Starry Messenger
(32,376 posts)10. "Pseudoscience in Sax on Sex"
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/201109/pseudoscience-in-sax-sex
PT blogger cherry-picks science to support single-sex schools
<snip>
This is not, however, the message that single-sex school advocate (and Psychology Today blogger), Leonard Sax, has been conveying. In December 2010, he blogged about a PNAS paper by Raznahan et al. which he alleged shows that "sex differences diminish as a function of age" (his emphasis).
To Leonard Sax, this idea is very important. If boys' and girls' brains differ from each other more than adult men's and women's brains differ, it justifies sending boys and girls to different classrooms and teaching them in different ways. Adult men and women may work and govern together, given our highly similar brains, but children aren't ready for this integration, because of their metaphorically pink or blue neural circuits.
As evidence, Sax refers readers to an online movie which is based on Figure 1 of the PNAS paper, but he misinterprets the figure legend. (The movie didn't play for me, and Sax warns readers they may have trouble playing it, but I'm assuming it is the same movie shown in a Wall St. Journal article that repeats Sax's mistaken interpretation, including its faulty caption.)
The figure/movie shows beautiful colorized brains, with cortical areas that are thicker in males shown in a blue-purple color scale, while areas that are thicker in females are shown in white (with no color scale, to avoid confusion with the male-larger color scale). What you see as the images progress from 9 to 22 years of age is that blue/purple areas give way to white areas in the frontal lobe. In other words, during early adolescence, males' gray matter is thicker through much of the cortex, but in adulthood, females' frontal gray matter is thicker, while males' gray matter remains thicker in other cortical lobes.
But Sax misread the figure legend! He states that the white coloring shows areas of no sex difference in cortical thickness, when in fact, the white depicts areas that are thicker in females. So despite what Sax wrote in his Psychology Today blog, the paper by Raznahan et al. does not demonstrate that sex differences are globally greater in childhood and diminish in adults.
PT blogger cherry-picks science to support single-sex schools
<snip>
This is not, however, the message that single-sex school advocate (and Psychology Today blogger), Leonard Sax, has been conveying. In December 2010, he blogged about a PNAS paper by Raznahan et al. which he alleged shows that "sex differences diminish as a function of age" (his emphasis).
To Leonard Sax, this idea is very important. If boys' and girls' brains differ from each other more than adult men's and women's brains differ, it justifies sending boys and girls to different classrooms and teaching them in different ways. Adult men and women may work and govern together, given our highly similar brains, but children aren't ready for this integration, because of their metaphorically pink or blue neural circuits.
As evidence, Sax refers readers to an online movie which is based on Figure 1 of the PNAS paper, but he misinterprets the figure legend. (The movie didn't play for me, and Sax warns readers they may have trouble playing it, but I'm assuming it is the same movie shown in a Wall St. Journal article that repeats Sax's mistaken interpretation, including its faulty caption.)
The figure/movie shows beautiful colorized brains, with cortical areas that are thicker in males shown in a blue-purple color scale, while areas that are thicker in females are shown in white (with no color scale, to avoid confusion with the male-larger color scale). What you see as the images progress from 9 to 22 years of age is that blue/purple areas give way to white areas in the frontal lobe. In other words, during early adolescence, males' gray matter is thicker through much of the cortex, but in adulthood, females' frontal gray matter is thicker, while males' gray matter remains thicker in other cortical lobes.
But Sax misread the figure legend! He states that the white coloring shows areas of no sex difference in cortical thickness, when in fact, the white depicts areas that are thicker in females. So despite what Sax wrote in his Psychology Today blog, the paper by Raznahan et al. does not demonstrate that sex differences are globally greater in childhood and diminish in adults.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

More on the studies of Leonard Sax, the web owner of Single Sex Schools-
Starry Messenger
Jul 2012
#5
The feminist case for SS classrooms is that is has been shown to increase girls test scores 30%.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#8
Schools can't do anything about socioeconomic status of the families living in the district.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#11
Parents who choose schools are defacto more involved in their children's education.
Starry Messenger
Jul 2012
#14
The "why" matters, else it's hard to ascribe the outcome to the intervention.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2012
#22
In this case, both the blue eyed and brown eyed students tested better.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#23
You missed the point about eye color but bias is one way that data can be corrupted.
Gormy Cuss
Jul 2012
#24
Do banks issue Mortgages based upon gender or income, payment histories etc?
One_Life_To_Give
Jul 2012
#21