Israel/Palestine

EarnestPutz

(2,843 posts)

35. "coed"???

Reply to JohnSJ (Reply #31)

Sun Dec 29, 2024, 03:43 PM

Dec 2024

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Huh, that sounds a lot like "from the river to the sea". [View all] Eko Dec 2024 OP

In terms of security he's right. Mosby Dec 2024 #1

I'm sure the Palestinians who say it aren't thinking about their security. Eko Dec 2024 #2

That was always their plan. Drive all the Palestinians from Gaza into Egypt. patphil Dec 2024 #3

Except Egypt won't take a single Palestinian. Mosby Dec 2024 #4

That's a horrible argument in many ways. Eko Dec 2024 #5

Not nearly as horrible as patphi's argument. Mosby Dec 2024 #7

You should just be able to agree that it is a horrible argument without having to turn around and attack someone else. Eko Dec 2024 #9

If you think their argument is horrible then make your case to them just like I did. Eko Dec 2024 #10

You didn't make much of a case, and one extremely tenuous claim does not comprise "reasons". lapucelle Dec 2024 #11

Its nothing like it except for the part where they wont take them in. Eko Dec 2024 #15

Your citation reads "The United States and the Refugee Crisis, 1938-41" lapucelle Dec 2024 #18

I never said anything about post WW2. Eko Dec 2024 #22

And "at the end of WWII " is not post WW2 either. Eko Dec 2024 #23

So now the contention is that UN Resolution 181 lapucelle Dec 2024 #25

I never said that either. Eko Dec 2024 #26

I said. Eko Dec 2024 #27

Keep digging. lapucelle Dec 2024 #30

Well I will bow to you as to the exact time frame I was talking about when I did not give an exact time frame. Eko Dec 2024 #37

Are you sure about that? AloeVera Dec 2024 #16

Yes, I'm sure about it. "Someone said something half a century ago" is not convincing evidence lapucelle Dec 2024 #17

You obviously missed the point on purpose. AloeVera Dec 2024 #21

How about a different reason from recently? Eko Dec 2024 #24

That doesn't explain concrete and steel walls lapucelle Dec 2024 #29

I think you can be against the smuggling of arms to a terrorist origination which was why the area was cleared Eko Dec 2024 #38

I beg your pardon. This statement of yours is almost laughable. brush Dec 2024 #28

Sounds like Israel needs a final solution to the Palestinian problem. Bok_Tukalo Dec 2024 #6

What do you suggest? A single state? Mosby Dec 2024 #8

Thanks to Trump voters, third party voters, and the Abandon Harris movement lapucelle Dec 2024 #12

I still think Netanyahu is going to be removed or step down soon Mosby Dec 2024 #32

"" The idea of annexing the OTs is wishful thinking promoted by a small minority of Israelis "" Israeli Jan 2025 #44

Then get rid of the coalition system Mosby Jan 2025 #47

Still cant get over the fact that you are calling .... Israeli Jan 2025 #49

Yup. JohnSJ Dec 2024 #33

Absolutely agree with you Israeli Jan 2025 #43

I wonder how many posters here who have an anti/Israeli bias even JohnSJ Dec 2024 #31

"coed"??? EarnestPutz Dec 2024 #35

A "genocidal statement", no? AloeVera Dec 2024 #13

The goose-stepping imagery is entirely coincidental and unintentional. AloeVera Dec 2024 #14

"Of course I'm not serious." lapucelle Dec 2024 #19

Ah the mocking and selective cutting and pasting... AloeVera Dec 2024 #20

That's from 1977, things change. Mosby Dec 2024 #34

Plus ca change... AloeVera Dec 2024 #36

The Likud hasnt changed Israeli Jan 2025 #45

Israel needs to sabbat hunter Dec 2024 #39

Dream on ..... Israeli Jan 2025 #46

I said sabbat hunter Jan 2025 #48

For a 'peacekeeping' force to be effective, surely there must be peace first? Aussie105 Dec 2024 #40

Yeah they don't want peace, and that's why they started the war on 10/7 right? ZRB Jan 2025 #41

Is that why they signed treaties with both Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #42