Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,233 posts)
10. And?
Fri Jun 20, 2025, 05:36 PM
Jun 20

We just saw Kagan veer away from the liberals in a SCOTUS ruling today, so it happens.

I think there are several issues with respect to CA and per the ruling, they didn't deal with all of them. You have a complaint that 45 didn't bother to "coordinate" with the Governor, then you have a different issue of 45 bringing in actual "military" (also not addressed).

The lower court argued that what was going on was not an insurrection justifying such an outsized response, but based on some of the arguments about people throwing chunks of concrete, etc., at federal officers, that was apparently taken into account.

In any case, the underlying suit continues but based on how 45 has been wantonly violating laws and misusing the military, it still begs to stop him in his tracks ASAP to at least send a signal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two felon appointed judges side with him...what a shocker JT45242 Jun 20 #1
If he did en banc BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #2
I wouldn't be so sure FBaggins Jun 20 #7
That was with a 3 judge panel BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #8
Yes - but it was unanimous FBaggins Jun 20 #9
And? BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #10
The ruling lists... littlemissmartypants Jun 20 #3
Post removed Post removed Jun 20 #4
Welcome to DU Bernardo de La Paz Jun 20 #5
What is the definition of a riot? EndlessWire Jun 20 #6
Remember, that was the 60s. The Grand Illuminist Jun 20 #12
And SCOTUS will agree. 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 20 #11
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»LA protests: US court all...»Reply #10