Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,261 posts)

9. Yes - but it was unanimous

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #8)

Fri Jun 20, 2025, 05:06 PM

Jun 20

Meaning the Biden appointee agreed with the decision. It would thus be optomistic to assume that other Democrats on the en-banc court would all dissent.

Also keep in mind that the 9th handles en-banc differently than other circuits due to its size. We don't really know which judges would be involved... and that there's little question how SCOTUS would rule (so such an appeal seems a waste of time).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LA protests: US court allows Trump to keep control of California national guard while lawsuit proceeds [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 20 OP

Two felon appointed judges side with him...what a shocker JT45242 Jun 20 #1

If he did en banc BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #2

I wouldn't be so sure FBaggins Jun 20 #7

That was with a 3 judge panel BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #8

Yes - but it was unanimous FBaggins Jun 20 #9

And? BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #10

The ruling lists... littlemissmartypants Jun 20 #3

Post removed Post removed Jun 20 #4

Welcome to DU Bernardo de La Paz Jun 20 #5

What is the definition of a riot? EndlessWire Jun 20 #6

Remember, that was the 60s. The Grand Illuminist Jun 20 #12

And SCOTUS will agree. 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 20 #11