Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bondi Eliminates ABA's Role in Vetting Trump Judicial Picks [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(168,791 posts)12. I am amused that Bondi announced this change at the same time a true asshole is being nominated by trump
The president insisted that Emil Bove is respected by everyone. All things considered, everyone was probably being generous.
Trump wants to make one of his controversial former defense lawyers an appeals court judge.
— hateGOP (@hategop.bsky.social) 2025-05-29T21:20:34.561Z
The conman insisted that Emil Bove is ârespected by everyone.â All things considered, âeveryoneâ was probably being generous.
www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-wants-make-one-controversial-former-defense-lawyers-appeals-cour-rcna209761
Nearly 20 years ago, during George W. Bushs fifth year in the White House, the Republican president thought itd be a good idea to nominate his own former lawyer, Harriet Miers, to serve as a U.S. Supreme Court justice. This quickly proved to be a fiasco, which collapsed within weeks.
Two decades later, Donald Trump is apparently thinking along similar lines: The incumbent GOP president, also in his fifth year, is nominating one of his own former lawyers to serve on the federal appellate bench. The New York Times reported:
......Lets start with Boves rise to prominence as a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, where he faced a variety of allegations about his lack of professionalism. The Associated Press reported a few months ago, One lawyer complained in the 2018 email that Bove was completely reckless and out of control in how he handled his cases. Another, upset about Boves rudeness and power plays, said he needed adult supervision. A third, a top federal public defender in the city, said he cannot be bothered to treat lesser mortals with respect or empathy.
The AP quoted Christine Chung, a former federal prosecutor, who said, In my experience litigating against him, what [Bove] enjoyed most as a prosecutor was wielding power the single worst possible trait for a public servant. But people wont speak against him publicly because hes also vindictive.
Bove later parlayed this background into a role as a Trump defense attorney, punctuated by his defeat in the Stormy Daniels case......
In fact, as my MSNBC colleague Lisa Rubin noted in February, Boves handling of the Adams case generated at least three complaints about him ... to the relevant New York state body responsible for attorney discipline. Around the same time, Rubin added, the Campaign for Accountability submitted a similar complaint to both the state and the chief judge of the Southern District, alleging that Boves conduct in connection with the Adams case may have violated at least six different ethical rules.
The idea that this guy deserves a lifetime position on the federal appellate bench is plainly absurd. Trumps nomination creates yet another test for Senate Republicans, which, if recent history is any guide, they will almost certainly fail.
The confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Watch this space.
Two decades later, Donald Trump is apparently thinking along similar lines: The incumbent GOP president, also in his fifth year, is nominating one of his own former lawyers to serve on the federal appellate bench. The New York Times reported:
President Trump announced Wednesday that he would nominate Emil Bove III, the polarizing and widely feared top Justice Department official responsible for strong-arm tactics in enacting Mr. Trumps immigration agenda, to be a federal appeals judge. Mr. Bove, 44, is a former criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump. He would fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which covers Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.
......Lets start with Boves rise to prominence as a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, where he faced a variety of allegations about his lack of professionalism. The Associated Press reported a few months ago, One lawyer complained in the 2018 email that Bove was completely reckless and out of control in how he handled his cases. Another, upset about Boves rudeness and power plays, said he needed adult supervision. A third, a top federal public defender in the city, said he cannot be bothered to treat lesser mortals with respect or empathy.
The AP quoted Christine Chung, a former federal prosecutor, who said, In my experience litigating against him, what [Bove] enjoyed most as a prosecutor was wielding power the single worst possible trait for a public servant. But people wont speak against him publicly because hes also vindictive.
Bove later parlayed this background into a role as a Trump defense attorney, punctuated by his defeat in the Stormy Daniels case......
In fact, as my MSNBC colleague Lisa Rubin noted in February, Boves handling of the Adams case generated at least three complaints about him ... to the relevant New York state body responsible for attorney discipline. Around the same time, Rubin added, the Campaign for Accountability submitted a similar complaint to both the state and the chief judge of the Southern District, alleging that Boves conduct in connection with the Adams case may have violated at least six different ethical rules.
The idea that this guy deserves a lifetime position on the federal appellate bench is plainly absurd. Trumps nomination creates yet another test for Senate Republicans, which, if recent history is any guide, they will almost certainly fail.
The confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Watch this space.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Sorry asshole, but your god emperor king man baby is, as you say, NOT ABOVE THE LAW!
Initech
May 2025
#1
Yep. However, he effectively is when the law isn't enforced, as has been the problem for the last 5 months...
Karasu
May 2025
#4
Administration comprised entirely of blatantly unqualified people continues to normalize appointing unqualified people.
Karasu
May 2025
#2
Well she can't prevent the ABA from publishing their opinions on every judicial pick
FakeNoose
May 2025
#3
Unfortunately, the ABA no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees' qualifications,
patphil
May 2025
#10
The ABA rated 10% of Trump's picks "Not Qualified" vs. 2% for Clinton, clear liberal gatekeeping!
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2025
#11
I am amused that Bondi announced this change at the same time a true asshole is being nominated by trump
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2025
#12
The ABA should go ahead and still publish their ratings on judicial nominees.
no_hypocrisy
May 2025
#30
The fascists ripping up the norms calling everyone and everything a left wing plot
Mr. Sparkle
May 2025
#31