Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(168,791 posts)
12. I am amused that Bondi announced this change at the same time a true asshole is being nominated by trump
Thu May 29, 2025, 06:02 PM
May 2025

The president insisted that Emil Bove is “respected by everyone.” All things considered, “everyone” was probably being generous.

Trump wants to make one of his controversial former defense lawyers an appeals court judge.
The conman insisted that Emil Bove is “respected by everyone.” All things considered, “everyone” was probably being generous.
www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

hateGOP (@hategop.bsky.social) 2025-05-29T21:20:34.561Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-wants-make-one-controversial-former-defense-lawyers-appeals-cour-rcna209761

Nearly 20 years ago, during George W. Bush’s fifth year in the White House, the Republican president thought it’d be a good idea to nominate his own former lawyer, Harriet Miers, to serve as a U.S. Supreme Court justice. This quickly proved to be a fiasco, which collapsed within weeks.

Two decades later, Donald Trump is apparently thinking along similar lines: The incumbent GOP president, also in his fifth year, is nominating one of his own former lawyers to serve on the federal appellate bench. The New York Times reported:

President Trump announced Wednesday that he would nominate Emil Bove III, the polarizing and widely feared top Justice Department official responsible for strong-arm tactics in enacting Mr. Trump’s immigration agenda, to be a federal appeals judge. Mr. Bove, 44, is a former criminal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump. He would fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which covers Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware.


......Let’s start with Bove’s rise to prominence as a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, where he faced a variety of allegations about his lack of professionalism. The Associated Press reported a few months ago, “One lawyer complained in the 2018 email that Bove was ‘completely reckless and out of control’ in how he handled his cases. Another, upset about Bove’s rudeness and power plays, said he needed ‘adult supervision.’ A third, a top federal public defender in the city, said ‘he cannot be bothered to treat lesser mortals with respect or empathy.’”

The AP quoted Christine Chung, a former federal prosecutor, who said, “In my experience litigating against him, what [Bove] enjoyed most as a prosecutor was wielding power — the single worst possible trait for a public servant. But people won’t speak against him publicly because he’s also vindictive.”

Bove later parlayed this background into a role as a Trump defense attorney, punctuated by his defeat in the Stormy Daniels case......

In fact, as my MSNBC colleague Lisa Rubin noted in February, Bove’s handling of the Adams case generated “at least three complaints about him ... to the relevant New York state body responsible for attorney discipline.” Around the same time, Rubin added, the Campaign for Accountability submitted a similar complaint to both the state and the chief judge of the Southern District, alleging that Bove’s conduct in connection with the Adams case may have violated at least six different ethical rules.

The idea that this guy deserves a lifetime position on the federal appellate bench is plainly absurd. Trump’s nomination creates yet another test for Senate Republicans, which, if recent history is any guide, they will almost certainly fail.

The confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Watch this space.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry asshole, but your god emperor king man baby is, as you say, NOT ABOVE THE LAW! Initech May 2025 #1
Yep. However, he effectively is when the law isn't enforced, as has been the problem for the last 5 months... Karasu May 2025 #4
i really do hate these people YoshidaYui May 2025 #14
It's insane that in one breath they say "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!!"... Initech May 2025 #15
Somebody's been huffin' SOMETHIN'!!!! BurnDoubt May 2025 #27
Administration comprised entirely of blatantly unqualified people continues to normalize appointing unqualified people. Karasu May 2025 #2
Well she can't prevent the ABA from publishing their opinions on every judicial pick FakeNoose May 2025 #3
This move will stop these nominees from cooperating with the ABA LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #6
Just assume ALL are unqualified. Buddyzbuddy May 2025 #5
Another lawsuit.... Lovie777 May 2025 #7
Based on what. onenote May 2025 #8
That's what happens when fascism takes over. SergeStorms May 2025 #9
Unfortunately, the ABA no longer functions as a fair arbiter of nominees' qualifications, patphil May 2025 #10
The ABA rated 10% of Trump's picks "Not Qualified" vs. 2% for Clinton, clear liberal gatekeeping! LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #11
I am amused that Bondi announced this change at the same time a true asshole is being nominated by trump LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #12
When? liberalgunwilltravel May 2025 #13
She wants to make sure that will never happen DFW May 2025 #21
The fuhrer wants his henchmen in those judgeships Mysterian May 2025 #16
Gee, its like they KNOW their candidates Figarosmom May 2025 #17
LOL! well said! orleans May 2025 #19
That IS, ironically enough, DFW May 2025 #22
Well, that's that. No more merit-based judicial appointments. Martin68 May 2025 #18
Trump wants to appoint Otto as Justice Minister DFW May 2025 #20
They don't need to be vetted by the Bar Assoc. LudwigPastorius May 2025 #23
ONLY TRUMP WHORES NEED APPLY Skittles May 2025 #24
Now, Skittles - you don't really want to negatively associate... dchill May 2025 #26
to be honest Skittles May 2025 #29
Gee, Pam - do you want everybody to think you're a shitty person? dchill May 2025 #25
Kiss the Ring three times and you're in. BurnDoubt May 2025 #28
The ABA should go ahead and still publish their ratings on judicial nominees. no_hypocrisy May 2025 #30
The fascists ripping up the norms calling everyone and everything a left wing plot Mr. Sparkle May 2025 #31
"I AM THE LAW!" yells judge bondi nt Javaman May 2025 #32
No problem Blondi Aviation Pro May 2025 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bondi Eliminates ABA's Ro...»Reply #12