Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

mahatmakanejeeves

(66,606 posts)

15. 6-2 to deny. "ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition."

Reply to Polybius (Reply #14)

Wed May 28, 2025, 05:49 AM

May 2025

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE
ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this
petition.
JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.

I just noticed that myself.

And good morning.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gorsuch, Thomas dissent as Supreme Court declines to take up Apache challenge to copper mine [View all] mahatmakanejeeves May 2025 OP

For christ's sake, how many times are white men going to screw over our indigenous people? Midnight Writer May 2025 #1

Theft of Indigenous lands Bayard May 2025 #6

And in this case, all of the Court's women Polybius May 2025 #14

6-2 to deny. "ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition." mahatmakanejeeves May 2025 #15

SCOTUS seems passive-aggressive & contrarian bucolic_frolic May 2025 #2

Well, the two dissents only underscore the "broken clock" theory... hlthe2b May 2025 #3

And here is direct evidence of how "religious freedom" slightlv May 2025 #4

I will be interested to see how the Apaches respond. TomSlick May 2025 #5

Makes me wonder what Gorsuch's and Thomas' true motivations are. Torchlight May 2025 #7

Gorsuch has long been a strong advocate for indigenous rights. mahatmakanejeeves May 2025 #8

Between his Dobbs' decision Torchlight May 2025 #9

it's an op, like maggats always do DoBW May 2025 #12

I donʻt understand this. Iʻm under a fair amount of stress and time stress too atm but this makes no sense to me. mahina May 2025 #10

Gorsuch has a strong history in siding with Native American issues before the court, so his vote I get Polybius May 2025 #13

Agree! Where the hell are we? bluestarone May 2025 #16

FAFO...wannabe John Galts spawn George Haydukes. pecosbob May 2025 #11

The big issue is the land is not reservation land but Federal Land.. EX500rider May 2025 #17