Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustAnotherGen

(36,714 posts)
8. Oops! Too late little Marco
Sat May 17, 2025, 11:12 AM
May 2025

Your maga Repub voters already did that.

Rubio claimed the U.S. government being forced to disclose certain information to third parties "simply because a lawsuit has been filed or a judge asked for the information" would "erode" the credibility of the United States, adding it could cause foreign states to be "less likely to work cooperatively with the United States in the future."

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What "significant harm" might that be? Ocelot II May 2025 #1
Exactly Hey Joe May 2025 #2
Truckload of manure wolfie001 May 2025 #3
When did you ever care about our national security interests, Weasel? Clouds Passing May 2025 #4
Everyone knows what the significant harm would be. Baitball Blogger May 2025 #5
Significant harm....to the Trump administration. Doodley May 2025 #6
Significant harm? usonian May 2025 #7
We the People will never know thanks to a truly rogue judge Evolve Dammit May 2025 #25
Oops! Too late little Marco JustAnotherGen May 2025 #8
In other words. Mblaze May 2025 #9
Rubio is a dick. Gimpyknee May 2025 #10
I call bullshit Wild blueberry May 2025 #11
Big ears Marco MaineNative May 2025 #12
Never confess. No matter how guilty. Shameless. Marcuse May 2025 #13
The "significant harm" is just more ketchup on the walls. We can't offend The Boy King Midnight Writer May 2025 #14
Lies Iamscrewed May 2025 #15
Only thing to trust is their incompetence bmichaelh May 2025 #16
If they had a VALID REASON for not obeying the Supreme Court ruling Martin Eden May 2025 #17
Cause significant harm to U.S. foreign relations and national security interests? Grins May 2025 #18
They still have to disclose it to the judge Nictuku May 2025 #19
That statement and supporting evidence angrychair May 2025 #20
Lying liars always lie Picaro May 2025 #21
I bet it would, for this administration. Joinfortmill May 2025 #22
BS nwduke May 2025 #23
Significant harm in the form of we ignored your silly ass laws.... Whoopsie Evolve Dammit May 2025 #24
What shithole musk Republicans have done to Garcia and his family........... Lovie777 May 2025 #26
Did he Traildogbob May 2025 #27
Yes, it would expose to the whole world the Trump Adminstration's lies about Abrego Garcia. Jim__ May 2025 #28
I used to think Lindsey Graham was the most unprincipled, two-faced, lying ass-kisser in the Republican party. sop May 2025 #29
Yeah, the old "we can't tell you because it would endanger national security" scam. That's wearing pretty thin Martin68 May 2025 #30
Cause significant harm to the Drumpf misadministration. Fixed it for you. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2025 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In unsealed declaration, ...»Reply #8