Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1% of precincts could be 31,000 votes. A precinct isnt defined by number of people or % of votes SSJVegeta 20 hrs ago #1
It would be nearly impossible for 0.6% of the precincts in the District Wiz Imp 20 hrs ago #4
Those are still averages though. We are talking about a county with both a large rural and urban population SSJVegeta 19 hrs ago #5
Update: it would be absolutely impossible for 0.6% of the precincts Wiz Imp 19 hrs ago #6
(Post deleted due to being off a factor of 10) SSJVegeta 19 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author padfun 19 hrs ago #10
0.6percent of 230 is 1.38 not 13. Something isn't mathing. mackdaddy 18 hrs ago #13
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 18 hrs ago #14
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta 18 hrs ago #16
So the claim is that DDHQ reported 99.4% reporting SSJVegeta 18 hrs ago #17
My experience was voters Deminpenn 18 hrs ago #21
That would have been my guess, but I'm pretty sure I read Wiz Imp 17 hrs ago #25
Scrap that. I see now this was brought forth by Thhis Will Hold Wiz Imp 16 hrs ago #32
K&R spanone 20 hrs ago #2
You don't get hand recounts in a nine point loss FBaggins 20 hrs ago #3
There was no 31k vote "jump" and nobody is calling for a recount cmmngrnd 19 hrs ago #8
I'm afraid it will become the norm to claim "We was Robbed," every time someone loses "on both sides." Silent Type 18 hrs ago #12
which the Trump maggot Republicans 'normalized' ! Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #26
Exactly, but we ain't got to do it too. Silent Type 17 hrs ago #27
Yeah, that last poll that showed the race within two points Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #28
That is true. I'd applaud the changes, but not in a sure loser like this one unless some honest to gawd bombshell Silent Type 17 hrs ago #29
I love your post. sheshe2 16 hrs ago #31
That's it iemanja 14 hrs ago #34
Post removed Post removed 18 hrs ago #19
It would be easy to prove the election advocates wrong. Chemical Bill 19 hrs ago #9
Recounts very rarely change the outcome by 0.5% iemanja 18 hrs ago #15
I think cheating by Republicans... Chemical Bill 18 hrs ago #18
I can tell you my recollection iemanja 17 hrs ago #22
My recollection is... Chemical Bill 17 hrs ago #24
It's about Jill Stein in the sense she collected money iemanja 14 hrs ago #33
You said Jill Stein kept the money... Chemical Bill 14 hrs ago #35
This is what Trump and his supremacist, KPN 19 hrs ago #11
Recommended. H2O Man 18 hrs ago #20
Let them pay for it Jose Garcia 17 hrs ago #23
Same grifters Boo1 16 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Election Advoca...»Reply #20