Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Littlebro

(1 post)
2. You can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again
Fri Oct 31, 2025, 04:49 AM
Friday

You can change the rules with simple majority. It doesn't matter if they go back to filibuster, once the precedent is established, Dems will simply change it back if they have majority. Even the old school traditionalists will vote for rule change.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They'll probably just carve out "clean CRs" nt FBaggins Friday #1
You can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again Littlebro Friday #2
Welcome to DU. But would Democrats do that? no_hypocrisy Friday #3
Let the GOP blamed for the demise of the ACA and children starving in the street. I hope Demsrule86 Friday #8
Welcome to DU Littlebro. 👋 littlemissmartypants Friday #14
The fillibuster worked VERY well until changes were made to the rules during Reagan's terms. marble falls Friday #16
There was nothing wrong with the filibuster until the Reagan Congress showed up. marble falls 12 hrs ago #21
Lots of support here for Democrats to get rid of it last year MichMan Friday #4
I don't even see anyone in this thread opposing nuking the filibuster Prairie Gates Friday #11
He likes to try to point out hypocrisy from DUers... W_HAMILTON Friday #18
IF dems regain power, johnnyfins Friday #5
If they do then Dems should immediately request all the Epstein files. lark Friday #6
It doesn't matter. They should absolutely "go nuclear" - it really mostly helps the GOP. If the GOP reverts, then... themaguffin Friday #7
Correct Prairie Gates Friday #10
The filibuster is stupid and should be gotten rid of Prairie Gates Friday #9
I support the filibuster, but not in its current form. Midnight Writer Friday #12
If people are still able to read in the next 250 years it could be worthwhile. littlemissmartypants Friday #13
The filibuster is a rule Renew Deal Friday #15
It was formed for exactly opposite reasons you claimed. Blame the change to the rules when Reagan was President, ... marble falls Friday #17
Did you respond to the right post? Renew Deal Friday #19
Expanding the Supreme Court would be our first move. Emile Friday #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*IF* Thune were to "go nu...»Reply #2