Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(104,191 posts)
1. "That would cut federal Medicaid dollars coming into the states, bit by bit over time"
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 03:45 PM
Jun 17

The key paragraph:

The House version mostly prohibited further rate expansions and new provider taxes. But the Senate version would actually cap the rate of provider taxes over time by reducing them by 0.5 percent per year starting in 2027, with an eventual cap at 3.5 percent by 2031. That would cut federal Medicaid dollars coming into the states, bit by bit over time.


And the conclusion:

All they did in the Senate was make the bill worse for states, worse for patients as states react by cutting programs back, and worse for hospitals as they lose more and more insured patients. The coverage losses will likely be worse than in the House, which also means more people will die as a result of the Senate’s actions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate Finance Committee ...»Reply #1