Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(128,726 posts)
16. Minnesota doesn't either, but some federal crimes provide for it.
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 12:06 PM
Jun 2025

He'll likely get life without parole on the state charges, and might be able to plead to that on whatever federal charges.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He Will Get Off Deep State Witch Jun 2025 #1
I don't think that will happen. The federal statute says Ocelot II Jun 2025 #2
They are saying on the news that the DOJ is charging him with murder. rzemanfl Jun 2025 #4
That would lose him more votes than gain. efhmc Jun 2025 #5
Do you think TSF gives a flying fuck about votes? rzemanfl Jun 2025 #7
Even if he did pardon, State can still charge/try/convict. Double Jeopardy DOES NOT ATTACH under hlthe2b Jun 2025 #10
He'll get convicted, although some MAGA rubes will cheer him. Silent Type Jun 2025 #3
The Trump DOJ appears to be charging him, rzemanfl Jun 2025 #6
Doubt they'll have any trouble coming up with charges for this guy. Silent Type Jun 2025 #11
They might have found some interstate connection that could confer federal jurisdiction, Ocelot II Jun 2025 #12
I am from Wisconsin which has never had a death penalty. rzemanfl Jun 2025 #14
Minnesota doesn't either, but some federal crimes provide for it. Ocelot II Jun 2025 #16
I lost my train of thought on the death penalty comment. rzemanfl Jun 2025 #17
Double jeopardy won't attach because of the dual sovereignty exception. Ocelot II Jun 2025 #8
Thank you! Of course, Roe v. Wade was precedent too. rzemanfl Jun 2025 #9
The Separate Sovereigns principle applies NutmegYankee Jun 2025 #13
Thank you. I have been reminded of this, assuming that sometime between 1968 and 1971, rzemanfl Jun 2025 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's my take. The DOJ's...»Reply #16