Health
Related: About this forumWomen's INQUIRY: 78 year old woman had double mastectomy, and docs recently
suggested removing ovaries and uterus. Commonly done, in U.S?
Thanks

question everything
(51,109 posts)NH Ethylene
(31,217 posts)You couldn't pay me to undergo preventative invasive procedures at that age. That's a lot of stress for an old body.
elleng
(140,988 posts)No Vested Interest
(5,267 posts)A small incision was made near the umbilicus (belly button) and those organs removed and opening then closed.
The hysterectomy was done for cause (uterine bleeding); tissue examined for cancer, etc.
Overnight in hospital, for caution.
I was back on my feet in short time and grateful for successful outcome and no future worries with those organs which I no longer needed.
Good luck in the case mentioned in post.
hlthe2b
(111,610 posts)but past studies have shown poor compliance in taking it, and chemotherapy alone is insufficient to prevent endogenous estrogen release that can result in uterine or ovarian cancer (and these patients have a higher risk of the latter). For this reason, many gynecological surgeons have been removing both the uterus and ovaries at the same time. I'd also mention that even post-menopausal women do produce some circulating estrogens.
A large study out of Australia showed a 30% decrease in these subsequent cancers, but only if both the uterus and the ovaries are removed. There were some limitations to that study, but it remains the most persuasive to underscore the practice. It did ONLY show the benefit when both the uterus and the ovaries are removed--not ovaries alone. The reason for the latter seems unexpected, but it was a statistically valid finding.
I will also underscore that both the practice and the study were largely conducted on younger women, so whether that would be an appropriate recommendation for someone considerably older is questionable.