Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Unintentional Experiment in Atmospheric Chemistry: The Covid Lockdown.
The paper I'll discuss in this post is this one: Atmospheric Chemistry Insights from the Global COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review Colette L. Heald, Jesse H. Kroll, Jennifer G. Murphy, Delphine K. Farmer, and Juliane L. Fry Environmental Science & Technology 2026 60 (14), 10393-10404
We often have scientific tools created unintentionally. One example is the Chornobyl Reactor Explosion which defined the worst case for a nuclear reactor failure as well as providing an avenue for understanding the effects of large radiation releases on an ecosystem.
Some years ago, on another website, I remarked that open air nuclear weapons testing provided a tool for monitoring the rate of soil erosion by releasing large quantities of 137Cs into the atmosphere.
The paper is open to the public to read, there is no reason for me to discuss it in detail, nonetheless, an excerpt:
1. Introduction
Air pollution degrades visibility, is ruinous to human health, and can alter global climate. (1,2) The concentration of reactive gases and particles in the atmosphere is controlled by a complex, nonlinear, and highly coupled cascade of processes (emissions, chemical transformations, physical removal). This complexity can obscure the relationship between emissions and atmospheric composition, complicating the crafting of effective environmental policies. In particular, evidence for the health risks associated with outdoor air pollution is strongest for PM2.5 and O3, which are predominantly secondary (or chemically formed) pollutants.
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the attendant worldwide reductions in anthropogenic emissions were an unparalleled global perturbation, providing an opportunity to examine how atmospheric chemistry and composition responds to large emissions reductions. Thus, this case study may anticipate the consequences of future air pollution policies (e.g., vehicle electrification) and impart novel insights into the chemical mechanisms at work in a cleaner atmosphere.
Air pollutant changes were widely reported during the COVID-19 pandemic; several reviews have summarized the observed departures in emissions and routinely measured air pollutants. (3−6) Despite the dramatic drop in emissions during this time, air pollution worsened in some regions. These consequences, while seemingly counterintuitive, were in many cases the result of known nonlinear atmospheric chemistry. In a comment piece published in 2020, we underscored the chemical complexities of air pollution and the research opportunities represented by the pandemic. (7) We highlighted the following four fundamental components of the atmospheric chemical system that can be informed by studying the COVID-19 response:
1. Key Emissions: What is the influence of specific chemical compounds or classes on local O3 and PM2.5 formation?
2. Chemical Regime: How do changes in emissions influence oxidant levels, peroxy radicals, and local chemical regimes? What effects do these have on secondary pollutants?
3. PM2.5 Chemistry and Impacts: How have number concentrations, mass concentrations, and chemical composition of particulate matter changed? Do such changes have an impact on the toxicity or cloud-forming potential of the particles?
4. Global Atmosphere: Are changes to atmospheric composition limited to urban/polluted regions, or do they extend to remote/pristine ones as well?
In this Review, we explore what studies focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic revealed about air pollution from the local to the global scale. We note that the effects of the pandemic were most strongly felt in early 2020 (boreal spring), and thus the air quality response, as described in the studies reviewed here, reflects the relatively weak photochemical conditions of that season. Comparable emissions changes in a different season may have had a markedly different effect. (8) We focus on how these studies inform our understanding of atmospheric chemistry and look to answer the above questions we posed 6 years ago...
Air pollution degrades visibility, is ruinous to human health, and can alter global climate. (1,2) The concentration of reactive gases and particles in the atmosphere is controlled by a complex, nonlinear, and highly coupled cascade of processes (emissions, chemical transformations, physical removal). This complexity can obscure the relationship between emissions and atmospheric composition, complicating the crafting of effective environmental policies. In particular, evidence for the health risks associated with outdoor air pollution is strongest for PM2.5 and O3, which are predominantly secondary (or chemically formed) pollutants.
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the attendant worldwide reductions in anthropogenic emissions were an unparalleled global perturbation, providing an opportunity to examine how atmospheric chemistry and composition responds to large emissions reductions. Thus, this case study may anticipate the consequences of future air pollution policies (e.g., vehicle electrification) and impart novel insights into the chemical mechanisms at work in a cleaner atmosphere.
Air pollutant changes were widely reported during the COVID-19 pandemic; several reviews have summarized the observed departures in emissions and routinely measured air pollutants. (3−6) Despite the dramatic drop in emissions during this time, air pollution worsened in some regions. These consequences, while seemingly counterintuitive, were in many cases the result of known nonlinear atmospheric chemistry. In a comment piece published in 2020, we underscored the chemical complexities of air pollution and the research opportunities represented by the pandemic. (7) We highlighted the following four fundamental components of the atmospheric chemical system that can be informed by studying the COVID-19 response:
1. Key Emissions: What is the influence of specific chemical compounds or classes on local O3 and PM2.5 formation?
2. Chemical Regime: How do changes in emissions influence oxidant levels, peroxy radicals, and local chemical regimes? What effects do these have on secondary pollutants?
3. PM2.5 Chemistry and Impacts: How have number concentrations, mass concentrations, and chemical composition of particulate matter changed? Do such changes have an impact on the toxicity or cloud-forming potential of the particles?
4. Global Atmosphere: Are changes to atmospheric composition limited to urban/polluted regions, or do they extend to remote/pristine ones as well?
In this Review, we explore what studies focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic revealed about air pollution from the local to the global scale. We note that the effects of the pandemic were most strongly felt in early 2020 (boreal spring), and thus the air quality response, as described in the studies reviewed here, reflects the relatively weak photochemical conditions of that season. Comparable emissions changes in a different season may have had a markedly different effect. (8) We focus on how these studies inform our understanding of atmospheric chemistry and look to answer the above questions we posed 6 years ago...
If interested, one is invited to read the full paper, which is, again, open for public reading.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
