Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEngineered material uses light to destroy PFAS, other contaminants
https://water.rice.edu/news/current-news/engineered-material-uses-light-destroy-pfas-other-contaminantsMaterials scientists at Rice University and collaborators have developed a material that uses light to break down a range of pollutants in water, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, the forever chemicals that have garnered attention for their pervasiveness.
The process involves the use of a class of materials known as covalent organic frameworks, or COFs, whose porous structure ⎯ and hence high surface area ⎯ make them useful in light-driven, or photocatalytic, reactions. When they interact with light, some of the electrons in COF molecules get displaced, forming holes, and this bifurcation of charges is what makes COFs good photocatalysts.
According to a study published in Materials Today, the Rice team grew a COF material directly onto a two-dimensional film of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), giving rise to a hybrid supercleansing surface that needs only light in order to cut through tough pollutants, including pharmaceutical waste, dyes and PFAS.
By combining two safe, lightweight materials in a new way, we built a powerful pollution-fighting surface that works quickly, works on many different pollutants and does not rely on metals that could harm the environment, said Yifan Zhu, a postdoctoral researcher in Rices Department of Materials Science and Nanoengineering and a first author on the study. This matters because it offers a cleaner, cheaper and more sustainable way to protect our water.
LonePirate
(14,331 posts)NNadir
(37,241 posts)...more than 3,000 hits in 0.13 seconds, substitute UV, and one gets 4,000 hits, again in 0.13 seconds, and visible light, close to 7000 hits.
Many MOF's (metal organic frameworks) are commercially available.
Pretty much every issue of Environmental Science and Technology has a few articles on the topic. In a year, I might come across close to 100 papers on the topic.
Here's a post I wrote referencing one sometime ago: Ecological Risk of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Degradation Products.
Here's another post wherein I discussed the topic: The Effect of Brine on the Radiation Driven Near Complete Destruction of "Forever Chemicals"
The world supply of boron nitride, which is produced at very high temperatures - and no, the closed Ivanpah solar facility will not produce these temperatures for boron nitride synthesis - is on the order of 300 metric tons.
One would think, given the thousands upon thousands of scientific papers written on breaking one of the strongest carbon bonds known, that to fluorine, all these "breakthroughs," we'd be saved, but we haven't been and we aren't.
Credulity is itself a problem.