Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A government
of laws, and
not of men.
—John Adams
of laws, and
not of men.
—John Adams
FIGHT
FOR
DEMOCRACY
FOR
DEMOCRACY
This is the
flower of
the partisan
Who died
for freedom
flower of
the partisan
Who died
for freedom
We Will
Drive MAGA
Back Under
Their Rocks
Drive MAGA
Back Under
Their Rocks
"I feel more
like I do
now."
- Professor
Irwin
Corey
like I do
now."
- Professor
Irwin
Corey
The mind
once
enlightened
cannot again
become
dark
once
enlightened
cannot again
become
dark
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Hanging in the sky tonight
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
The image isn't rotated.
The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.
Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec