'Extremely disturbing and unethical': new rules allow VA doctors to refuse to treat Democrats, unmarried veterans
Source: The Guardian
Mon 16 Jun 2025 06.00 EDT
Doctors at Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals nationwide could refuse to treat unmarried veterans and Democrats under new hospital guidelines imposed following an executive order by Donald Trump. The new rules, obtained by the Guardian, also apply to psychologists, dentists and a host of other occupations. They have already gone into effect in at least some VA medical centers.
Medical staff are still required to treat veterans regardless of race, color, religion and sex, and all veterans remain entitled to treatment. But individual workers are now free to decline to care for patients based on personal characteristics not explicitly prohibited by federal law. Language requiring healthcare professionals to care for veterans regardless of their politics and marital status has been explicitly eliminated.
Doctors and other medical staff can also be barred from working at VA hospitals based on their marital status, political party affiliation or union activity, documents reviewed by the Guardian show. The changes also affect chiropractors, certified nurse practitioners, optometrists, podiatrists, licensed clinical social workers and speech therapists.
In making the changes, VA officials cite the presidents 30 January executive order titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. The primary purpose of the executive order was to strip most government protections from transgender people. The VA has since ceased providing most gender-affirming care and forbidden a long list of words, including gender affirming and transgender, from clinical settings. Medical experts said the implications of rule changes uncovered by the Guardian could be far-reaching.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/16/va-doctors-refuse-treat-patients

UpInArms
(52,910 posts)This maladminstration is evil
Trueblue1968
(18,598 posts)GB_RN
(3,378 posts)F**k?!?!
Doctors take an oath upon graduation, and theres nothing there about refusing care because the patient is an other. Hell, you cant refuse medical care for wounded POWs.
I am flabbergasted. 😵💫
BlueKota
(4,317 posts)should have their medical license stripped away by their state's medical board, if they refuse to treat anyone.
GB_RN
(3,378 posts)If say the worst pedophile was brought to my hospital with a heart attack, I couldnt refuse to treat him. Personal feelings and politics have nothing to do with patient care.
Blackjackdavey
(219 posts)Any Licensed Social Worker (LCSW) will likely find themselves in hot water with their prospective licensing board for unethical behavior. OFC, they'll just start hiring unlicensed people but hey, why should veterans expect experienced help anyway I guess?
Docreed2003
(18,293 posts)


BlueKota
(4,317 posts)Donny and the SC6 have for all intents and purposes ripped it up and burned the shreds.
Marthe48
(20,864 posts)The Ten Commandments?
The Sermon on the Mount?
Human decency?
Docreed2003
(18,293 posts)BattleRow
(1,647 posts)Silent Type
(10,030 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,003 posts)and sues everybody who sues him.
None of this will deter him.
SpankMe
(3,494 posts)I know it won't go anywhere since Repubs own the legislative branch. But it makes a statement of resistance and also has everything in writing so that when and if Dems have control again, they have the legislation drafted and ready to push through quickly.
The Grand Illuminist
(1,821 posts)to add political affiliation, ideology, and party to be protected classes for the civil rights act.
we must resist on all levels constantly
Marthe48
(20,864 posts)Dudley Moore made a deal with Satan (Peter Cook) to win the love of a woman (Eleanor Bron) he adored. Try as he might, Moore couldn't get the language of the deal written without a loophole that Satan took advantage of. I think Moore had 7 chances to get the wording correct. Dark, funny movie.
Anyway, I get the feeling that no matter how the law is written, felon rapist will find a lawyer willing to twist the law into something obscene, or ignore it.
He's 79, and falling apart.
bdamomma
(68,575 posts)and executive orders!!!!!!! He is a threat to all of us!!!!! Mock him continuously.
SupportSanity
(1,456 posts)Maybe there should be a directory of providers who are denying service based on their prejudice to ____ insert prejudice here.
sakabatou
(44,904 posts)azureblue
(2,453 posts)eating pork. So can I refuse to pay money to a bacon eater?
All this is, is using the government to force religious values on others.
surfered
(7,322 posts)rsdsharp
(10,906 posts)Attilatheblond
(6,297 posts)edited for typo
Attilatheblond
(6,297 posts)Raise hell!
MIButterfly
(623 posts)Is there no low he won't stoop to? And to Hell with his followers and enablers too.
Disgusting. But I should expect no less from the likes of him.
Fil1957
(98 posts)Bev54
(12,532 posts)jls4561
(2,435 posts)William769
(59,062 posts)
mkp
(9 posts)Personal Note: From me to you Stable GeniusDonald DON'T FUCK WITH OUR VA BENEFITS sir.
PS Your birthday parade party sucked!
TommieMommy
(2,079 posts)chouchou
(1,977 posts)Hey...I can dream...
Prairie_Seagull
(4,249 posts)I think it is important to really understand what the Hippocratic Oath is and what it is not.
Read in it's entirety. The important stuff is down in this entry. IMO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
Lulu KC
(8,132 posts)Again.
I can't imagine the Supremes backing up this kind of hogwash.