Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(299,179 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 03:56 PM 5 hrs ago

Holy Shit- Russian frigate fires warning shots at British yacht in Channel

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/16/russian-frigate-fires-warning-shots-at-british-yacht-in-channel-reports

Shots fired within 500 metres of vessel near Isle of Wight amid heightened tensions between London and Moscow

A Russian warship fired warning shots within a few hundred metres of a British pleasure yacht sailing across the Channel on Tuesday morning amid a period of heightened tensions between London and Moscow.

The rare incident took place at 11.40am more than 20 miles south of the Isle of Wight and less than 40 miles north of Normandy, France, when the yacht, identified as the private vessel Bright Future, sailed close to the Admiral Grigorovich and ignored at least one warning.

British sources said initial indications were that more than one shot was fired by Russian sailors after the yacht had got close to the heavily armed frigate. “Following attempts to contact a British vessel in the channel, the Grigorovich fired warning shots. These were not aimed at the vessel and were an attempt to prevent a possible collision,” the Ministry of Defence said.

“We assess that this is an isolated incident and not linked to the UK’s interception of the Smyrtos this weekend. HMS Mersey has been monitoring the Russian vessel and support has been provided to the crew of the yacht.”




34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holy Shit- Russian frigate fires warning shots at British yacht in Channel (Original Post) malaise 5 hrs ago OP
Will Trump send in the Navy to back Russia? dem4decades 5 hrs ago #1
I don't know, but he has reinstated the full sanctions on Russian oil. marble falls 5 hrs ago #3
He did something right? Thanks for the info. dem4decades 5 hrs ago #5
He really has done noting, if the sailboat hadn't lost wind and drifted too close, with a standard reaction ... marble falls 5 hrs ago #8
WTF are Russian ships doing in the English Channel? ananda 5 hrs ago #2
There is an international channel through the Channel and Russian as well as other nation's military go through ... marble falls 5 hrs ago #6
As marble falls says, they are allowed there. The warship has been escorting tankers with Russian oil muriel_volestrangler 5 hrs ago #11
WTF............ Lovie777 5 hrs ago #4
Sounds like someone should lose thier Captain license. Lochloosa 5 hrs ago #7
Bingo. The Russians just tend to use a louder alarm. The US would have done the same but maybe with a ... marble falls 5 hrs ago #10
Yep. I've been on the water since I was a kid. Been around carriers, warships etc. Lochloosa 5 hrs ago #12
If it were in the early seventies, I might have waved atcha. Navy Boomers are a sight to see when they steam out. ... marble falls 4 hrs ago #16
It was an amazing sight. Also one i knew was a once in a lifetime. Lochloosa 3 hrs ago #29
The Ohio class subs are about 25% bigger! The newest class, Columbia a little larger. marble falls 2 hrs ago #32
It was big enough to get our attention. Lol. Lochloosa 2 hrs ago #34
THIS malaise 5 hrs ago #13
Really? You've got that in writing, with what "close" means? muriel_volestrangler 5 hrs ago #15
Sorry, can't agree with you. It states in the article, they tried to raise the vessel more than once. Lochloosa 4 hrs ago #17
You were saying the captain broke a rule serious enough to "lose their licence" muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #19
That's one opinion. Warships are sovereign and what the Russians did was within International Law and Conventions ... marble falls 4 hrs ago #18
Jesus, Americans really seem to worship warships muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #20
There are only five nations capable of supporting a Blue Water Fleet, meaning they can show up anywhere ... marble falls 4 hrs ago #21
I have no idea what that has to do with this story muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #22
He broke international law. He was reported to UK authorities. What do you think I missed???? ... marble falls 3 hrs ago #24
Who "broke international law"? What law? muriel_volestrangler 3 hrs ago #27
"I have no idea what that has to do with this story" I was responding to your statement above ... marble falls 3 hrs ago #25
Stunning indeed malaise 2 hrs ago #33
Please note: there no bloody shirts in that exchange. Repelling boarders is best done at a half kilometer than at ... marble falls 4 hrs ago #23
Doesn't sound like that BF a D. Disaffected 5 hrs ago #9
Correct malaise 5 hrs ago #14
Yes, tell the yacht owners to: Disaffected 3 hrs ago #26
Well, the English channel is a much safer place for Russian vessels than the Black Sea... pecosbob 3 hrs ago #28
The yacht had no one on deck TexLaProgressive 2 hrs ago #30
More crappy reporting! BidenRocks 2 hrs ago #31

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
8. He really has done noting, if the sailboat hadn't lost wind and drifted too close, with a standard reaction ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:13 PM
5 hrs ago

...(one the US has done many times in the past in other areas of the planet), this wouldn't have raised the attention of anyone past the UK shadowing the Ruskis with their own warship. The US Navy also sails in international sea lanes just to let everybody know they can, especially with China in the South China Seas.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
6. There is an international channel through the Channel and Russian as well as other nation's military go through ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:06 PM
5 hrs ago

... they were being shadowed (as always) by a UK warship.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
11. As marble falls says, they are allowed there. The warship has been escorting tankers with Russian oil
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:18 PM
5 hrs ago

which may explain why, although the UK said in March was prepared to stop tankers with the embargoed Russian oil, it hasn't happened until this week. If this Russian warship has been close to many of the tankers in the channel, the UK probably didn't want to risk an incident with an armed Russian ship.

The frigate is understood to have been operating in the area for some time and had been repeatedly re-supplied by a repair vessel.

Satellite images reviewed by BBC Verify have shown the repair vessel, the PM-82, operating between the Channel and the North Sea in recent months.

Nato officials believe the PM-82 delivered food, water and other supplies to the Admiral Grigorovich, allowing it to stay at sea for extended periods of time and lead Russian convoys though the Channel.

In April, the frigate was reported to have escorted six shadow fleet vessels through the waterway while being monitored by the Royal Navy.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20yzm84r7lo

Lochloosa

(16,834 posts)
7. Sounds like someone should lose thier Captain license.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:10 PM
5 hrs ago

You don't get close to ANY warship. They were just waking up the captain.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
10. Bingo. The Russians just tend to use a louder alarm. The US would have done the same but maybe with a ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:16 PM
5 hrs ago

... lighter touch.

Lochloosa

(16,834 posts)
12. Yep. I've been on the water since I was a kid. Been around carriers, warships etc.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:21 PM
5 hrs ago

You give them a wide berth.

I was fishing out of Kings Bay in GA and watched a Trident nuclear sub come out of the base. We powered down and let it go past.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
16. If it were in the early seventies, I might have waved atcha. Navy Boomers are a sight to see when they steam out. ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:39 PM
4 hrs ago

... we would have used high pressure hoses on you if you got too close.

When I was at New London there was a guard at each boat on the pier. He was armed with only a .45. An unloaded .45. No bullets, not even like Barney Fife, who got to have a round in his pocket.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
15. Really? You've got that in writing, with what "close" means?
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:29 PM
5 hrs ago

Warships are not moving blobs of sovereign territory, just because they've got weapons. Getting close to them in a busy shipping lane should be no different to getting close to any similarly sized ship; just a question of what traffic rules apply, and the options of each vessel.

Lochloosa

(16,834 posts)
17. Sorry, can't agree with you. It states in the article, they tried to raise the vessel more than once.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:41 PM
4 hrs ago

Also, again according to the article, the shots were not close, just waking them up. If they meant any harm, we would be reading about ship debris. A US flag warship would have most likely done the same thing. Remember the USS Cole? No Captain is going to make that mistake again.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
19. You were saying the captain broke a rule serious enough to "lose their licence"
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:55 PM
4 hrs ago

There is no specific legal requirement of a licence to skipper a boat that size in UK waters, or to visit France from the UK: https://www.rya.org.uk/boating-abroad/country-specific-advice/france/

But my main point is that you are saying there is an explicit rule that the British boat broke. This isn't about whether the Russian frigate meant harm, or if it did the right thing. You were saying no boat, anywhere, should approach with 500m of any warship (and there's been nothing indicating it was a collision course).

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
18. That's one opinion. Warships are sovereign and what the Russians did was within International Law and Conventions ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:52 PM
4 hrs ago

... even if heavy handed. Every Navy in the world would have the same in the Channel - where every Blue Water navy plies in international waters, though short of firing over the bow. And in this case all it meant was a handful of sailors firing rifles.

How did you feel about the the the attack on the US detroyer that let small boats get too around Hormuz and almost the only US Navel vessel sunk since WWII?

https://www.fbi.gov/history/cases-and-criminals/uss-cole-bombing

On October 12, 2000, two suicide pilots of a small bomb-laden boat pulled alongside of the USS Cole at midship, offered friendly gestures to several crew members, and detonated their explosives.

The U.S. destroyer, en route to the Persian Gulf, was making a prearranged fuel stop at the port of Aden, Yemen, when the attack occurred.

The blast ripped a 40-foot-wide hole near the waterline of the Cole, killing 17 U.S. sailors and injuring nearly 40 other crew members.
















Maybe the Cole should have started shooting sooner?

/@@images/image/high

/@@images/image/high

And 17 dead swabbies and 40 wounded.

Almost forgot the Sullivan.

The extensive FBI investigation ultimately determined that members of the al Qaeda terrorist network planned and carried out the bombing. The investigation also revealed that the USS Cole bombing followed an unsuccessful attempt on January 3, 2000, to bomb another U.S. Navy ship, the USS The Sullivans. In this earlier incident, the terrorist boat sank before the explosives could be detonated; however, the boat and the explosives were salvaged. The boat was then refitted, and the explosives were tested and reused in the USS Cole attack.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
20. Jesus, Americans really seem to worship warships
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:58 PM
4 hrs ago

This was half a fucking kilometre away, in a slow sailing boat, and you're pretending this is equivalent to getting close enough to damage it with explosives?

I really didn't think the bloody shirt would be waved like this here.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
21. There are only five nations capable of supporting a Blue Water Fleet, meaning they can show up anywhere ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:15 PM
4 hrs ago

... the US, UK, France, Russia and China is now building one.

These fleets are for one purpose whether in peace or war project a national presence wherever they go either for the "press", snuffing out political unrest ("Gunboat Diplomacy&quot or to fight.

Let alone that the US Navy/US Army by being everywhere is one of if the biggest sources of humanitarian aid on the planet.

It's not the Navy you should fear. It's some of the leaders we have. I totally believe the US military did not go along with or do some of the things TACO wanted done in Iran. Our military has been among the most unpolitical forces anywhere, UK's is also: they just don't meddle in national politics, past looking for your tax dollars.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
22. I have no idea what that has to do with this story
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:21 PM
4 hrs ago

especially with this sub-thread, in which the claim was made that the skipper of the yacht should "lose their licence" for coming within 500m of a warship. As if warships (are you saying "just warships of the permanent Security Council members", since you list them?) have special rights to have nothing approach them, even if they're in one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world, and this is something that is enforced by banning people from sailing.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
24. He broke international law. He was reported to UK authorities. What do you think I missed???? ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:35 PM
3 hrs ago

... I'm trying to explain why he was in the wrong, why the Russians were correct (they remember the Cole, they might have even supplied the 3,000# of high explosives), if maybe a little heavy handed. Why didn't the small boat answer when the Russians hailed on radio and by loud speaker? The Russians didn't use machine guns like the US does.

I don't know what you don't get about this, but it's pretty clear I'm not getting though. Have a great DU day!

muriel_volestrangler

(106,763 posts)
27. Who "broke international law"? What law?
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:45 PM
3 hrs ago

Are you saying there's a law that you can't approach within 500 metres of another vessel? Citation needed.

The couple on the yacht say they altered course after the frigate sounded its horn. But the Russians did think that was enough, and then did the small arms fire (and everyone acknowledges that was not aiming near the yacht at all). The yacht then started its motor, and turned 90 degrees (which should not be needed, but when the other guy has used a weapon, you don't count on them being reasonable). I cannot see what the "law" you claim was broken was.

And I still can't see how your post on blue-water navies explained your position.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
25. "I have no idea what that has to do with this story" I was responding to your statement above ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:39 PM
3 hrs ago
"Jesus, Americans really seem to worship warships
Reply to marble falls (Reply #18)
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 03:58 PM

This was half a fucking kilometre away, in a slow sailing boat, and you're pretending this is equivalent to getting close enough to damage it with explosives? "

Don't worship them, I do respect them.

marble falls

(73,263 posts)
23. Please note: there no bloody shirts in that exchange. Repelling boarders is best done at a half kilometer than at ...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:25 PM
4 hrs ago

... the rail. Somali pirates are fired at before they shoot and at distance further than 1,600 ft (half a kilometer) beforethey open fire themselves..

Stay clear of anybody's warship at sea.

What are you trying to say about me?

Disaffected

(6,668 posts)
9. Doesn't sound like that BF a D.
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:15 PM
5 hrs ago

Thing is, you don't get too close to a warship uninvited, Russian or not.

Disaffected

(6,668 posts)
26. Yes, tell the yacht owners to:
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:40 PM
3 hrs ago

. open their eyes
. turn on their ship radio
. stay away from war ships (especially Russian)
. change their underwear

pecosbob

(8,519 posts)
28. Well, the English channel is a much safer place for Russian vessels than the Black Sea...
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:52 PM
3 hrs ago

If they get anywhere within 1000 miles of Ukraine it will be quickly promoted to submarine.

TexLaProgressive

(12,807 posts)
30. The yacht had no one on deck
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 06:35 PM
2 hrs ago

The Russians tried radio, loud hailer and finall got a response. The yacht idiot moved the tiller about 2 degrees which is not enough. That's when the Russian fire the warning shot.

Yacht idiot, " Oh I guess they want us to move" starts aux engine and swings 90 degrees out of the ship.

You don't claim right away with trains or ships.

BidenRocks

(3,614 posts)
31. More crappy reporting!
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 06:59 PM
2 hrs ago

The facts first! It was a SAILBOAT!
It did not answer hails from the Russian vessel.
Calling it a pleasure yacht doesn't jibe with jibs!
It is intentionally misleading to inflame tensions!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Holy Shit- Russian frigat...