Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(80,085 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 11:50 AM 15 hrs ago

Intentional obstruction in the name of transparency. In other words, fuckery!


Intentional obstruction in the name of transparency. In other words, fuckery!

Intentional obstruction in the name of transparency. In other words, fuckery!

Helio Fred Garcia (@hfgarcia.bsky.social) 2026-02-10T16:21:13.332Z
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Intentional obstruction in the name of transparency. In other words, fuckery! (Original Post) riversedge 15 hrs ago OP
Love love love Jamie Raskin :) AZJonnie 15 hrs ago #1

AZJonnie

(3,271 posts)
1. Love love love Jamie Raskin :)
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 12:08 PM
15 hrs ago

If Maga Mike and the GQP congresscritters finagle some way to disallow Democrats from having computer time, declaring that since they hold the (tiny) majority, they get to set the agenda for how that screen time is allocated, that's when ALL Democrats need to get loud in unison.

If the GQP doesn't do that, as it stands now, however, Democrats should be able to make some progress by focusing on the most-likely-incriminating documents. Maybe poll the investigative reporters on our side to help them determine what to focus on first, based on the redacted shit the public can see. Been a lot of work on that already, use that resource, Dems!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Intentional obstruction i...