General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"An Ode To Greenland" from The Resistance
FYI, I did a quick search here on DU for this song title in an effort to avoid duplications. Hope I didn't miss an earlier post offering up this musically bright and cleverly worded entry.
highplainsdem
(60,646 posts)AZJonnie
(3,066 posts)highplainsdem
(60,646 posts)Collimator
(2,102 posts)I, too, have concerns about it. But every technology since the control of fire has the potential to offer both harm and benefits.
Would you like me to take it down? Is there any level of computer-assisted creative endeavor that meets with your approval?
highplainsdem
(60,646 posts)theft of intellectual property to train the AI models. It's exploitative technology that also dumbs users down, enables all kinds of fraud from student cheating to deepfakes, harms the natural environment and the internet, and worsens surveillance and inequality.
So no, I don't like it. I consider it the most harmful non-weapon tech ever developed, and it's increasingly used by the military. I've heard of very few positive uses that can begin to offset the harm it does.
It does not assist with creative endeavors. It offers a pretense of real creativity via a plagiarism machine.
A lot of these AI slop channels are from foreign content farms. Even if they're from individuals in the US, AI-generated protest songs simply can't show real intent, thought, emotion and talent. It's. just a simulation. Use of AI shows a lack of respect for real artists, who lose attention they deserve as AI slop flood platforms. Musk has been bragging thid week that people using his Grok AI generated 5.5 billion images in a single month. Music platforms are deluged with millions of AI tracks a month.
Humans deserve better.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220980469