General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEpstein accomplice drops courtroom bombshell: 25+ secret payoffs with no criminal charges
By Daniel Hampton
Published January 27, 2026 7:15 PM ET
Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, may be serving time in a cushy Texas federal prison, but the convicted child sex trafficker just detonated a political time bomb from behind bars, according to a new Daily Beast report Tuesday.
In a recent habeas petition, Maxwell dropped a bombshell claim that four potential "co-conspirators" and "25 men" scored "secret settlements" tied to Epstein's abuse without facing any indictment.
The report said Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department are doing everything possible to avoid one glaring question: "Who are these men, and why are they still being protected?"
https://www.rawstory.com/ghislaine-maxwell-2675052422/
Raven123
(7,607 posts)Should
Cchild abusers are being protected by the Gurdiens O f Pedos GOP re pukes
FakeNoose
(40,476 posts)
SheltieLover
(77,798 posts)AKwannabe
(6,884 posts)After they off her.
Riiiiiiiiiiight
.
ToxMarz
(2,780 posts)And that it has been made it known they do so offing her won't get rid of the problem. I'm sure she's already thought of that.
LiberalArkie
(19,411 posts)Wednesdays
(21,779 posts)Such as a thick file tucked away in a safe deposit box. Accessible to several unknown informers.
The goons can kill off some. But they won't be able to kill everybody.
dflprincess
(29,229 posts)if not an outright pardon.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,288 posts)... trying to buy/influence her way out.
Volaris
(11,457 posts)If she walks, she better have her OWN private island to go live on; she won't be safe anywhere civilized people live.
blueknight73
(331 posts)She is using this to try to get an official " get out of jail free card " . I wouldn't be surprised if she has an "accident " in her cell.
AZJonnie
(3,020 posts)The 29 dudes all called her up to tell her about their secret settlements, because, why?
And what were the nature of these "settlements"? Who offered them? What did they entitle the recipients TO?
If you want my opinion, she probably got this off some shady internet CT site.
This scumbag has lied her ass off ALL ALONG. I'm not inclined to start believing her now, and ESPECIALLY do not trust her motives
ETA: Let me also add that a main Maxwell "angle" all along has basically been "the agreement for the non-prosecution of people involved with Epstein (from the 2008 case) should protect me too, I'm only in trouble because I'm a women and they're all powerful men". I would bet money that this 25 number is meant to be a count of the number of "men" who supposedly WERE allowed to "skate" because of that same 2008 non-prosecution agreement.
If you think this some kind of "coming clean", or "exposure of the guilty" you, it is almost certainly not. It's much more likely to be another salvo in a legal angle she's been working for many years. Now her lawyers are just adding a count/number because it sounds better. She's also ranted about corrupt jurors, corrupt prosecutors who were in cahoots with the victims lawyers, etc etc etc.
To be clear I'm not saying some men (or even women, such as Virginia Giuffre) didn't "skate" pursuant to that NPA because I really don't know.
But neither does she.
dpibel
(3,815 posts)"If you want my opinion, she probably got this off some shady internet CT site."
Sure, it's your opinion.
But what facts do you have to back it up?
And what is your basis for this: "If you think this some kind of "coming clean", or "exposure of the guilty" you, it is almost certainly not."
Rules for me but not for thee?
And, just to be clear, you're suggesting that Virginia Giuffre was subject to prosecution, but for the NPA? That's a new one on me.
AZJonnie
(3,020 posts)Her books says it's her greatest regret, etc.
So, yeah, if the cops wanted to be assholes, they could have prosecuted her as well. It's not like there's a carveout in the law that says being a paid member of a minor sex trafficking ring is totally A-OK if you're only 17 (and perhaps of note, she didn't leave Epstein's orbit until she was over 18). Legally, she self-admittedly was "part of the ring", we (rightly) choose to deem her innocent because she was groomed by Epstein.
That's not to say that the NPA *is* why she wasn't (again you'll notice I did not claim she wasn't, only that maybe she was), but it's not like it's unthinkable. There's exactly 4 people who were expressly listed in that NPA. And they were all 4 women.
You'll notice that in EVERY quote you're bringing up here, I'm allowing for the possibility that I'm wrong. And like I said, Maxwell has been working that NPA angle all along, and my guess, which I'm clear on ... is that what she's actually claiming is that "25 men" benefitted from the NPA, but not her, pursuant to her long-time claims that her prosecution and trial was corrupted.
You know, by Garland and Biden's DoJ
dpibel
(3,815 posts)I don't think you can claim to be based entirely on truth and facts and then engage in whatever speculation you see fit.
Although I suppose I'm fine with that as long as you never upbraid anyone else for expressing opinions that are supported by "I think this makes sense."
As ever, I am fascinated by your fascination with the Epstein matter, and think, but am not sure, I know what your angle on it is.
AZJonnie
(3,020 posts)It is based on the fact that I've followed this case very closely (even I am not sure why except there's a great deal of intrigue involved) ever since the 2017 Herald article. I know a lot of details, and I've considered everything I've learned with a very critical eye, and shied away from the larger-scale conspiracy theories.
I stipulate my assessments could still be wrong, as I must under the circumstances, but these are not random things I'm pulling from my rear end, I assure you.
I've alluded to and explained in many different ways over the past 8 months or so what my "angle" is. I don't buy into a lot of what other people take as gospel surrounding this case, particularly the "big pedo cabal" theory, rather, I think it's much more likely that Epstein kept the fact that he was abusing minors by paying them for sex mostly hidden (except from Trump, he OBVIOUSLY knew exactly what Epstein was up to). In fact, I'm not entirely convinced anyone else directly "partook", shall we say? It's possible, but I doubt it's to nearly the scale that many people seem to accept as fact.
But another part of my angle is that I don't think Biden's DOJ just sat on a bunch of blatant evidence (esp. not that's going to "come out" in Trump's Epstein files release), and I don't believe Virginia Guiffre's claims that she was forced by Epstein into sex with Senators George Mitchell and Bill Richardson as she claimed. By this I mean I don't believe that (sex) happened between her and those two men, to be clear.
Gaugamela
(3,333 posts)Second, Virginia Giuffre was a victim, not someone who skated because of the NPA.
Third, you say: I would bet money that this 25 number is meant to be a count of the number of "men" who supposedly WERE allowed to "skate" because of that same 2008 non-prosecution agreement. Well yeah, thats explicitly what shes alleging. Its the whole point of the article. Theres nothing to bet on.
Fourth, nobody trusts Ghislaine Maxwell. Of course youre going to take it with a huge grain of salt.
Fifth, the reason everyone got a NPA is they were involved or at least peripherally involved in intelligence work. CIA, Mossad, MI6. And since Ghislaine Maxwell was a close friend and confidant and co-conspirator of Epsteins up until his death, it is not out of the question that she would be familiar with the details of the NPA, as it would be central to everything they were up to and affected her directly. Epstein would know about the details because of his intelligence connections.
It is widely believed that the Washington Post got the Epstein birthday book page from Maxwells lawyers. It would make no sense for her to allege made-up nonsense because Trump and the DOJ know what the truth is. Maxwell knows Trump is about to die and she will use everything she has to get a pardon, but made up lies would have zero leverage.
AZJonnie
(3,020 posts)"Third ... Well yeah, thats explicitly what shes alleging. Its the whole point of the article. Theres nothing to bet on."
Except this rawstory article says no such thing. Go read it. Its headline also says "payments" when no such thing is actually alleged.
"It is widely believed that the Washington Post got the Epstein birthday book page from Maxwells lawyers"
Actually, we know it was the Wall Street Journal, and that it came from the Epstein estate
"Fifth, the reason everyone got a NPA is they were involved or at least peripherally involved in intelligence work."
Well, there is also the fact that there's four people explicitly named as being excluded pursuant to that NPA, and those are Epstein's female assistants running his Estates and businesses in various purviews: Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova.
Its safe to assume that these four women in some sense benefitted from the NPA, not that any of them were necessarily "guilty", but perhaps the NPA was to grant them immunity hoping they'd tell authorities what they knew about what Epstein was up to, and that hopefully others would similarly come forward, given this NPA? ETA: admittedly, this is a bit backwards if it were their intent, they could've put the squeeze on the women instead and it seems like Acosta et al did not approach it that way. At minimum they were glad-handing that fucker, but I'm not 100 this is not just because he's was a rich, connected asshole with plenty of money for the best lawyers.
However, we the public have never known for a fact that anyone else avoided prosecution vis-a-vis this NPA, only that Maxwell tried, and failed. 15 years too fucking late to have been a part of what the intent of the NPA actually was.
My bet is that Maxwell is blowing smoke, she has no idea if anyone else skated due to the NPA apart from the 4 women who were in it. I guess we'll see, won't we? If I'm wrong, I promise to admit it. I do it ALL THE TIME here and elsewhere
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,288 posts)... her and her daddy's Mossad connections, amongst others.
AZJonnie
(3,020 posts)Running a honeypot/entrapment operation rather the situation having been a "powerful pedo cabal". There are some interesting theories and tidbits of evidence that hint at that possibility, lets just say.
Here where I've come down on this idea after a good bit of consideration. I think it's possible that it "started that way" in some sense, but their "mission" if you will was not one that was meant to involve minors. Powerful people stepping out on their wives with young (but legal) models, and feeding some intelligent outfit the dirt from that? I think that's not impossible.
But I think Epstein and Maxwell were sick fucks, and their handlers might not have known how to deal with it when they started "going too far", paying minors for sex, and possibly even dangling them in front of "targets". In 2008 they got "covered for" because the operation as a whole, even without minors, was shady-ass shit but JE/GM knew they'd be covered for for that very reason. I also think that is not an impossible scenario.
Very conspiratorial and very much hypothetical, but I don't reject it completely due to some things we know were said in the past by various players, and the fact that Epstein had a reportedly VERY official Saudi Arabian passport, like the kind that only governments can provide.
a kennedy
(35,473 posts)🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬 🤬
Easterncedar
(5,699 posts)rubbersole
(11,059 posts)One thing seems glaringly obvious. Important people are willing to go to WW3 rather than have the truth get out. I'm surprised someone hasn't leaked the raunchy stuff yet.
ananda
(34,557 posts)Is it a one-day wonder that reaches a few...
or does it have legs.
Deuxcents
(25,799 posts)If true, she been withholding information and/or shes lying.
Shipwack
(3,020 posts)Kid Berwyn
(23,452 posts)Don't forget the banking transactions.