Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MayReasonRule

(3,560 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 04:32 PM Friday

'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together

https://wegotthiscovered.com/news/how-convenient-gop-just-unveiled-a-new-act-to-make-you-forget-what-donald-trump-and-epstein-did-together/

In what looks like a desperate effort to shift public focus, Republican Representative Addison McDowell of North Carolina has introduced a new bill called the “Ban on Inkless Directives and Executive Notarizations Act of 2025,” or the “BIDEN Act.”

This proposed law would ban the use of autopen machines for presidential signatures on important documents like finalized bills, executive orders, pardons, and commutations.

The act claims that only the president personally can legally sign such papers. The bill also states that any document signed in the past or future that breaks this rule would be considered invalid, as Fox News reports, as if there’s not bigger news happening with the current sitting president.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together (Original Post) MayReasonRule Friday OP
Right. Retroactive laws. Raven123 Friday #1
Hmmm. I doubt that the current supremacist court will object though. markodochartaigh Friday #2
So, I guess that would invalidate about 50 years of proclamations, pardons, and EOs. sinkingfeeling Friday #3
Well, there's a whole bunch of J6 pardons right out the window. JHB Friday #4

markodochartaigh

(3,375 posts)
2. Hmmm. I doubt that the current supremacist court will object though.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 04:41 PM
Friday

Retroactive legislation may raise various separation-of-powers concerns. For example, in Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995), the Supreme Court held unconstitutional on separation-of-powers grounds a statute that would have required federal courts to reopen final judgments entered before its enactment because the law interfered with the judicial power to rule with finality.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11293

JHB

(37,792 posts)
4. Well, there's a whole bunch of J6 pardons right out the window.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 05:04 PM
Friday

It's not as if he personally signed 1500 pardons (in one day).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'How convenient': GOP jus...