Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together
https://wegotthiscovered.com/news/how-convenient-gop-just-unveiled-a-new-act-to-make-you-forget-what-donald-trump-and-epstein-did-together/In what looks like a desperate effort to shift public focus, Republican Representative Addison McDowell of North Carolina has introduced a new bill called the Ban on Inkless Directives and Executive Notarizations Act of 2025, or the BIDEN Act.
This proposed law would ban the use of autopen machines for presidential signatures on important documents like finalized bills, executive orders, pardons, and commutations.
The act claims that only the president personally can legally sign such papers. The bill also states that any document signed in the past or future that breaks this rule would be considered invalid, as Fox News reports, as if theres not bigger news happening with the current sitting president.
This proposed law would ban the use of autopen machines for presidential signatures on important documents like finalized bills, executive orders, pardons, and commutations.
The act claims that only the president personally can legally sign such papers. The bill also states that any document signed in the past or future that breaks this rule would be considered invalid, as Fox News reports, as if theres not bigger news happening with the current sitting president.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

'How convenient': GOP just unveiled a new 'Act' to make you forget what Donald Trump and Epstein did together (Original Post)
MayReasonRule
Friday
OP
So, I guess that would invalidate about 50 years of proclamations, pardons, and EOs.
sinkingfeeling
Friday
#3
Raven123
(6,869 posts)1. Right. Retroactive laws.
Sadly SCOTUS May just let them get away with it.
markodochartaigh
(3,375 posts)2. Hmmm. I doubt that the current supremacist court will object though.
Retroactive legislation may raise various separation-of-powers concerns. For example, in Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211 (1995), the Supreme Court held unconstitutional on separation-of-powers grounds a statute that would have required federal courts to reopen final judgments entered before its enactment because the law interfered with the judicial power to rule with finality.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11293
sinkingfeeling
(55,937 posts)3. So, I guess that would invalidate about 50 years of proclamations, pardons, and EOs.
JHB
(37,792 posts)4. Well, there's a whole bunch of J6 pardons right out the window.
It's not as if he personally signed 1500 pardons (in one day).