Maybe they didn't publish the actual drawing because

[intrepidity]

the image is of a *very* young female--the description by WSJ says

A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

Really interesting emphasis on the size of the arcs eh? (yes. i bolded it but "small" was by WSJ)

Also, his signature being interpreted as pubic hair could be misleading, since he didn't *actually" draw any hair at all, just put his name over a bare pubis.

[BWdem4life]

1. I like that his signature "mimics pubic hair"

He should add some dots to mimic his pubic louses

[maxrandb]

2. My guess is that the drawing looks like Ivanka

With today's "press", the only reason they wouldn't show it, is because they are afraid they'd be sued for violating "Name, Image, Likeness" laws...

or,

Knowing the Dipshits family, they'd sue for royalty payments.

Fuck every last stupid mother-fucker that thought this ass-pickle as leader of the free world would be a good idea.

Just fuck them to hell and back.

[yardwork]

3. The only reason they haven't published it is to protect Republicans.

All the WSJ cares about is money.

If a Democratic politician had done this the WSJ would have published it right before the election, when it would go the most damage.