Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrivatize or downsize the USPS? Rural customers worry either option will hurt them
As a new postmaster general with ties to FedEx assumes control of the agency, postal workers and their customers are bracing for either scenario, especially as corporate America weighs in.
By Nick Loomis
July 17, 2025
Rural letter carrier Roger McDonald missed driving his 150-mile route outside Scottsbluff in western Nebraska earlier this year. He was injured in a serious car accident that kept him from mail delivery for three months. He had an appointment scheduled with the doctor who rebuilt his right hand on May 8, so he decided to do a dry run the day before in case he was cleared to return.
As the pavement turned to gravel on Crow Road, McDonald said long distances, low population density and poor infrastructure make rural delivery difficult and unprofitable. His point was soon proven. Among the routes first stops are two mailboxes separated by a dilapidated bridge over an irrigation canal. Before the bridge was closed, it was a 50-yard trip between them, McDonald said at the first mailbox. He then drove nearly three miles to reach the second.
Under the universal service obligation, which mandates mail delivery to every address in the country, a rural letter carrier will drive more than 700 miles to serve those two households in a normal year.
Its never going to make financial sense, said McDonald, 61, from the drivers seat of his preferred delivery vehicle, a Dodge Caravan. But thats a big reason why the universal pricing system was generated. Because we knew we had to service every Americans home, not just the Americans homes that provide us a profit.
FULL story: https://flatwaterfreepress.org/privatize-or-downsize-the-usps-rural-customers-worry-either-option-will-hurt-them/

Rural letter carrier Roger McDonald (left) catches up with Edgar Clemens in rural Gering, Neb., on May 9 McDonalds first day back on the route after three months of medical leave. McDonald said he loves the sense of community fostered by the Postal Service, which he fears would disappear if his route was curtailed by cutbacks or eliminated by privatization. Photo by Nick Loomis, The Midwest Newsroom
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Privatize or downsize the USPS? Rural customers worry either option will hurt them (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jul 17
OP
gab13by13
(29,044 posts)1. Neither one.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,181 posts)2. Neither
99% of my mail is junk, and I never use them to send anything of value, but I know that many people rely on them.
bucolic_frolic
(51,617 posts)3. Rural areas will be screwed
6 day delivery will go. Mon, Wed, Fri, Sat will remain. No delivery Tue and Thur in rural areas.
PO boxes are through the roof. About 9 times higher than 25 years ago.
Over the years delivery charges in rural areas have been mentioned for privatization. Like $20 a month.
Everything is being stolen from us.
hatrack
(63,123 posts)4. Gosh, so sorry to hear that they're getting what they voted for . . .

Celerity
(51,126 posts)5. The price of living in a Trumpyland sector.
Reap what you sow.
Unfortunately this is case for some who never ever voted for him, as the vast majority of their self-chosen neighbours did, and now the MAGAt mushroom milkers have put you to the cosh as well.