Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(126,580 posts)
Thu Jul 17, 2025, 12:12 PM Jul 17

New U.S. assessment finds American strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites

WASHINGTON — One of the three nuclear enrichment sites in Iran struck by the United States last month was mostly destroyed, setting work there back significantly. But the two others were not as badly damaged and may have been degraded only to a point where nuclear enrichment could resume in the next several months if Iran wants it to, according to a recent U.S. assessment of the destruction caused by the military operation, five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment told NBC News.

The assessment, part of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to determine the status of Iran’s nuclear program since the facilities were struck, was briefed to some U.S. lawmakers, Defense Department officials and allied countries in recent days, four of those people said.

NBC News has also learned that U.S. Central Command had developed a much more comprehensive plan to strike Iran that would have involved hitting three additional sites in an operation that would have stretched for several weeks instead of a single night, according to a current U.S. official and two former U.S. officials.

President Donald Trump was briefed on that plan, but it was rejected because it was at odds with his foreign policy instincts to extract the United States from conflicts abroad, not dig deeper into them, as well as the possibility of a high number of casualties on both sides, one of the current officials and one of the former officials said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-assessment-finds-american-strikes-090043623.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New U.S. assessment finds American strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 17 OP
That was obvious the second that they all started grabbing the thesaurus and settled on "obliterated"... Moostache Jul 17 #1
Wait! You mean we were lied to?!?!?! bif Jul 17 #2
Again ? Shocked I tell you. republianmushroom Jul 17 #4
So 33% totally obliterated. tanyev Jul 17 #3

Moostache

(10,705 posts)
1. That was obvious the second that they all started grabbing the thesaurus and settled on "obliterated"...
Thu Jul 17, 2025, 12:20 PM
Jul 17

These are not eriudite people in the Trump orbit. They are what he calls everyone else - stupid people. None of the boot licking sycophants are intelligent, just craven. When the verbiage was chosen (and I am betting on Stephen Miller here - it reeks of his style of bombast and idiocy more than the others), and then circulated to the 'team' for constant parrotting, it was OBVIOUS that we had botched the whole thing.

What? You might say... No way! You might think....
Yes, way. The truth is that Americans and their government have ALWAYS overestimated the capability of our weapons and the reliability of the ordinance in field usage. Has been true since Vietnam and really still is.

How were we bogged down in Vietnam for nearly a decade? Why were we losing men to IEDs and stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan for 15+ years? We blew shit up in both places anywhere we could drop bombs, and yet we never "completely obiliterated" anything.

The cold truth is this - unless you invoke the nuclear weapons option, you are never going to "totally oblietate" anything.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New U.S. assessment finds...