Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate rulekeeper deals blows to revised 'Big, beautiful bill'
Senate rulekeeper deals huge blows to Trumpâs revised âBig, beautiful billâ
— Jon Cooper (@joncooper-us.bsky.social) 2025-06-29T18:21:01.293Z
A Medicaid carveout for Alaska was among the âByrd bathâ casualties.
A Medicaid carveout for Alaska was among the Byrd bath casualties.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/29/megabill-byrd-alaska-megabill-parliamentarian-00431730
The Senates rewritten domestic policy bill faces new hurdles after the parliamentarian advised senators Sunday that several provisions violate the chambers strict rules for budget reconciliation bills.
The rulings, released in a memo from Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee, come as Senate Republicans are still trying to ensure they have the votes for final passage of their signature legislation.
Two provisions added to the bill just days ago and tailored specifically to boost Medicaid payments to Alaska and Hawaii have been ruled to violate the Senates Byrd rule. That limits what can pass through the reconciliation process with a simple majority.
GOP leaders had hoped the Medicaid provisions focused on non-contiguous states, along with other Alaska-friendly changes, would be enough to win the vote of Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). She had voiced concerns over deep cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Murkowski voted to move forward with the bill Saturday night after making committee chairs and leadership sweat.
Elsewhere, Senate Republicans attempted to expand a Medicare drug-price negotiation exemption for orphan drugs to include medicines that treat multiple rare diseases. But the parliamentarian ruled it is not in compliance with rules and could threaten the ability to pass the megabill with a simple majority. The orphan drug provision was in the House-passed bill, but was not included in the first Senate Finance Committees proposal earlier this month
The rulings, released in a memo from Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee, come as Senate Republicans are still trying to ensure they have the votes for final passage of their signature legislation.
Two provisions added to the bill just days ago and tailored specifically to boost Medicaid payments to Alaska and Hawaii have been ruled to violate the Senates Byrd rule. That limits what can pass through the reconciliation process with a simple majority.
GOP leaders had hoped the Medicaid provisions focused on non-contiguous states, along with other Alaska-friendly changes, would be enough to win the vote of Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). She had voiced concerns over deep cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Murkowski voted to move forward with the bill Saturday night after making committee chairs and leadership sweat.
Elsewhere, Senate Republicans attempted to expand a Medicare drug-price negotiation exemption for orphan drugs to include medicines that treat multiple rare diseases. But the parliamentarian ruled it is not in compliance with rules and could threaten the ability to pass the megabill with a simple majority. The orphan drug provision was in the House-passed bill, but was not included in the first Senate Finance Committees proposal earlier this month
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Senate rulekeeper deals blows to revised 'Big, beautiful bill' (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 29
OP
BootinUp
(50,099 posts)1. Maybe it's a good time to switch sides? Nt
WhiteTara
(30,957 posts)3. why would we want her?
BootinUp
(50,099 posts)4. You know the answer. nt
WhiteTara
(30,957 posts)6. do you think she would be loyal?
I don't. She would be a Manchin at best.
Tom Rinaldo
(23,127 posts)7. Manchin voted for a Democrat to be Senate Majority leader
And the Senate Majority leader has a lot of power. I don't disagree with your assessment, but I would take it for now.
malaise
(286,770 posts)2. "Byrd bath"
😂
Diamond_Dog
(37,647 posts)5. So she would vote for it if it contained special favors for Alaska
But screwed everyone else? What the hell kind of reasoning is that?