Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. California allows the import and gestation of foie gras, but not the force feeding of geese.
Mon Aug 5, 2013, 12:32 AM
Aug 2013

The California foie gras law, California S.B. 1520,[1] is a California State statute enacted in 2004 that prohibits the "force feed[ing of] a bird for the purpose of enlarging the bird's liver beyond normal size" as well as the sale of products that are a result of this process.[2] This outlaws the traditional method of producing foie gras in California. The law went into effect on July 1, 2012.[3][4]

The law does not prohibit the consumption of foie gras, giving it as a gift, or its importation from outside California.

S.B. 1520 was introduced in the California State Legislature on February 19, 2004[5] by then-Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton at the request of a coalition of animal protection organizations that included Viva!USA, Farm Sanctuary, Los Angeles Lawyers for Animals, and the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights.[6]

Burton stated, "We just shouldn't be cramming a tube down a duck's throat and forcing in food to make foie gras," and that foie gras production is "an inhumane process that other countries have sensibly banned. I'm pleased California will be next on the list."[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_foie_gras_law

I guess the French are happy enough to sell foie gras to Californians.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»World Forum»Israel risks French ire w...»Reply #1