Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,107 posts)
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 09:46 AM Wednesday

BREAKING: 11th Cir. upholds $1M penalty on Trump & Habba for frivolous suit v. Hillary Clinton, Comey, DNC, etc.

BREAKING: 11th Cir. upholds M penalty on Trump & Habba for frivolous suit v. Hillary Clinton, Comey, DNC, etc. over Russia claims. 'Trump & his attorneys committed sanctionable conduct,' per Judge W. Pryor (GWB) w/Brasher (Trump) Kidd (Biden) Doc: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein.bsky.social) 2025-11-26T14:43:21.940Z

Eleventh Circuit affirms million sanctions award against Trump attorneys, led by Alina Habba, for frivolous "racketeering" lawsuit against Hillary Clinton (among many others): storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Adam Steinbaugh (@adamsteinbaugh.bsky.social) 2025-11-26T14:19:15.994Z
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: 11th Cir. upholds $1M penalty on Trump & Habba for frivolous suit v. Hillary Clinton, Comey, DNC, etc. (Original Post) In It to Win It Wednesday OP
I've been wondering if there was any recourse to his vexatious litigation to terrorize others jmbar2 Wednesday #1
YES!!! no_hypocrisy Wednesday #2
So much winning. MarineCombatEngineer Wednesday #3
INCOMING KETCHUP!!!! Just_Vote_Dem Wednesday #5
Meh, the Supremes will over turn it... Wounded Bear Wednesday #4
I have been following this lawsuit for a long time. LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #6
It's bs the the US taxpayers have to pay this penalty kimbutgar Wednesday #7
It's about damn time his abuses of the courts stop! Initech Wednesday #8
Plus credit card interest, 23% Old Crank Wednesday #9
Erump and Habba's court loss Dave Id Wednesday #10
I refer to the USSC popsdenver Wednesday #11
Is Habba still keeping the AG chair warm in NJ? Bev54 Wednesday #12
Thank you, Judge WILLIAM PRYOR! FakeNoose Wednesday #13
'Indeed frivolous': Appeals court upholds $1 million penalty against Trump and his lawyer LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #14
K&R for, getting this week back on track! UTUSN Wednesday #15
Sucks to be you Donny Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #16

jmbar2

(7,481 posts)
1. I've been wondering if there was any recourse to his vexatious litigation to terrorize others
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 09:57 AM
Wednesday

I hope more people subjected to his abuse of the legal system will hit back hard. Kudos to the judge!

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,257 posts)
6. I have been following this lawsuit for a long time.
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 10:33 AM
Wednesday

The lawyers in this case deserved to be sanctioned and those sanctions may include disbarment.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/judge-sanctions-trump-lawyers-frivolous-anti-clinton-case-rcna56799?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma

Donald Trump and his lawyers have suffered quite a few defeats of late, and as CNBC reported yesterday, their latest setback will hit their wallets.

A federal judge Thursday sanctioned attorneys for former President Donald Trump to pay $50,000 as penalty for advancing a “frivolous” lawsuit against a raft of Trump’s political enemies, including Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee. Judge Donald Middlebrooks’ scathing order in Florida federal court suggested Trump’s lawyers had undermined the rule of law by pushing a political narrative in court “without factual basis or any cognizable legal theory.”


......The judge in the case didn’t just reject the underlying claims, Middlebrooks could barely contain his disgust with the inanity of the legal complaint.

American courtrooms are not supposed to be abused by politicians filing frivolous cases for no reasons. Those who do open themselves up to possible sanctions — and in this case, the district court judge seemed open to that possibility in September......

The penalties were imposed on several Trump lawyers, including Alina Habba. What’s more, the sanctions may not end there: “Additional sanctions may be appropriate,” the judge added in yesterday’s ruling.

kimbutgar

(26,540 posts)
7. It's bs the the US taxpayers have to pay this penalty
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 12:01 PM
Wednesday

Because you know the orange piggy won’t pay a dime of his own money.

And I hope I’m wrong. Did E Jean Carroll ever get paid?

Old Crank

(6,494 posts)
9. Plus credit card interest, 23%
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 12:09 PM
Wednesday

From the original date of the judgment and legal fees for the appeals.

popsdenver

(1,158 posts)
11. I refer to the USSC
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 12:26 PM
Wednesday

As a "Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Republican Party.......the best judges the republican party could buy

Bev54

(13,075 posts)
12. Is Habba still keeping the AG chair warm in NJ?
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 12:36 PM
Wednesday

I suspect it is on appeal but have heard no more but I know the Judge considers her illegal and if she signs her name to anything it could be considered void. So is she still sitting there collecting a paycheque?

LetMyPeopleVote

(173,257 posts)
14. 'Indeed frivolous': Appeals court upholds $1 million penalty against Trump and his lawyer
Wed Nov 26, 2025, 05:59 PM
Wednesday

I have been following this lawsuit for a while. This case was a joke.

'Indeed frivolous': Appeals court upholds million penalty against Trump and his lawyer

#TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2025-11-26T15:04:41.000Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-alina-habba-2674344756/

A federal appeals court upheld a $1 million penalty against President Donald Trump and his former lawyer Alina Habba for filing a "frivolous" lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, James Comey and others.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Trump's 2022 lawsuit – which first came in at 108 pages and then 193 pages in an amended complaint – violated federal court rules with tenuous links between a myriad of defendants and legal claims.

"The district court decided that the amended complaint advanced legal theories foreclosed by precedent 'that the most basic legal research would have revealed,'" reads the 36-page decision.....

"Trump leaves all these frivolous claims behind, making a total of 11 of his 16 claims he does not appeal," the court ruled. "Trump and Habba give us no reason to reverse the district court’s ruling that these claims were frivolous."
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: 11th Cir. uphol...