General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMind your own damn business.
Shouldn't be that hard.
There have been many times when I wanted to use this message and didn't have it so perfectly presented. Now I do. Many of you will have uses for it as well. Thanks Kay Ensley Newman/Rachel Maddow fans/FB.
— ElizabethC ðð¸ (@econklin44.bsky.social) 2025-11-25T22:44:11.062Z
#ProudBlue
AllaN01Bear
(28,175 posts)TommieMommy
(2,545 posts)Karadeniz
(24,699 posts)bluesbassman
(20,358 posts)If so, why?
erronis
(22,124 posts)it seems that he would not have any right to claim authority over where those things ended up.
Just as if I were to sneeze and millions of my droplets ended up infecting someone - would I be able to be accused of intentionally causing harm?
calimary
(88,624 posts)This DAMMIT!!!
Dave Bowman
(6,352 posts)GoodRaisin
(10,664 posts)erronis
(22,124 posts)The other germinators spread their pollen freely and mostly ignore responsibilities.
2naSalit
(99,204 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)It'd be nice if you were supportive.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)Permanut
(7,812 posts)Maximum safety occurs when healthcare decisions are made between providers and patients.
Abortions should be legal, and subject only to the judgment of the mother.
Rarity is only achieved through education and availability of birth control resources.
Just my two cents, which makes no provision for input or control by politicians, religious leaders or insurance companies.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)Permanut
(7,812 posts)Just thinking of the safety factor, in that availability of birth control resources would likely reduce the necessity for abortion.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)Permanut
(7,812 posts)plus I'm an old male, so I need to tread lightly with my assumption -
which is that prevention of pregnancy would be safer than termination.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)ancianita
(42,669 posts)Socio-political issues aside, safety and health risks can be seen in the numbers.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)When Permanut said
pat_k
(12,569 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 25, 2025, 10:49 PM - Edit history (2)
I have not met a SINGLE woman who chose to have an abortion who took it "lightly" in the way you imply.
Those who didn't have access to birth control would have FAR preferred to have had access to the birth control that would have helped them AVOID the pregnancy .
Those who became pregnant after a failure of the inadequate birth control available (e.g., diaphragm or condom), would have MUCH preferred more effective methods.
Those who became pregnant after a rape would have MUCH preferred access to the Morning After pill (which was not available when I grew up).
In my 45 years as an adult on this planet, I do not know ANY FEMALE person who would "choose" abortion as a method of birth control. That is a canard.
If birth control were available at no cost to all female humans capable of becoming pregnant, I can GUARANTEE abortions would be extremely rare indeed.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 25, 2025, 09:56 PM - Edit history (1)
But that's what it is, in the end. It prevents a birth by ending a pregnancy. People (not just "females" ) choose it all the time.
pat_k
(12,569 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)pat_k
(12,569 posts)...to date the people I have encountered who assert that abortion is used as a primary method of birth control have been anti-abortion males promoting the notion that legal and safe abortions would create some sort of sodom and gomorrah.
I apologize for my McCarthyesque query. I am ashamed of that sort of response. I've been on DU for over 20 years because discussion here is generally better than that.
You are of course correct to point out that abortion is in fact a form of birth control in that it terminates a pregnancy. But I stand by my assertion that access to information and access to effective methods of birth control for all girls and women would make abortion a more rare method of last resort. And that is how I have always interpreted Hillary Clinton's quote
And I also stand by my personal experience with women who have had abortions. For everyone I've talked to about it (including my own experience) it was a difficult decision. In some cases, a very difficult decision that it took many years to fully come to terms with. Life would have been far easier if birth control had been available to them without restriction, in an easily accessible clinic, and without cost.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,048 posts)biophile
(1,061 posts)The fact that it isnt all of these things is a matter of law, policy, religion, and personal attitudes.
But it certainly could be all of those things.
pat_k
(12,569 posts)And while the decision may be easy for many women, that doesn't mean they wouldn't have preferred to have avoided the pregnancy entirely.
Access to the most effective methods, such as IUD's or implants, without parental consent, is still impossible in half of our states.
That is intolerable.
Access to free birth control reduces abortion rates
A study from Washington University School of Medicine shows that providing free birth control to women reduces unplanned pregnancies and abortions
by Diane Duke WilliamsOctober 12, 2012
https://medicine.washu.edu/news/access-to-free-birth-control-reduces-abortion-rates/
A new study by investigators at Washington University reports that providing birth control to women at no cost substantially reduces unplanned pregnancies and cuts abortion rates by a range of 62 to 78 percent compared to the national rate....
Whether it's a policy goal or not, access to effective birth control reduces abortion rates by something like 60% or 80%.
That tells me that when given the choice, women choose methods like IUD's or implants over less effective methods and sequential abortion as back up "birth control" method.
Ping Tung
(4,082 posts)pat_k
(12,569 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 25, 2025, 10:10 PM - Edit history (2)
... now, they are not just denied that right, but their doctors are DENIED the choice to fulfill their hippocratic oath by performing a medical procedure that preserves the life of a woman over the continued "life" of a fetus -- a "life" which is either non-viable as a result of a defect or clearly non-viable under Roe v. Wade.
From Rev. Dr. Dan Brockway "I found Roes focus on fetal viability to be a decent compromise. Once a developing fetus has a fighting chance of surviving outside the womb, elective termination of the pregnancy (outside of serious health complications) is more or less objectively immoral.
When does life begin? Reckoning with surprising answers in Scripture
Rev. Dr. Dan Brockway
Jul 19, 2022
Excerpts
For it was you who formed my inward parts;
you knit me together in my mothers womb.
On Jeramiah
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.
God intimate knowledge of us -- not when.
Life begins at first breath
"Then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being."
Then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
It would seem, therefore, that Gods law in the Old Testament recognizes a difference between human life outside the womb (once first breath has been drawn) and the potential life status of a developing fetus.
Perhaps the biggest takeaway from surveying the Bibles teaching around life and when it begins is that we need to exercise some humility. As Christians, we should strive to relate all of our views and actions to Scripture. When the witness of Scripture is not fully clearand especially when it clashes with our assumptionsthat should call our own certainty into question and inspire humility.
Maybe we are not meant to fully understand when life begins. Maybe Godin Gods infinite wisdomdecided that such knowledge is beyond our paygrade. And maybe thats okay.
Clouds Passing
(6,638 posts)niyad
(128,865 posts)Parenthood Black Friday (Nov 27, 2015) murderer has died.
pat_k
(12,569 posts)I also didn't know he was never found competent to stand trail, with an evaluation as recent as last month.
Joinfortmill
(19,669 posts)NNadir
(37,010 posts)Why is this so difficult to grasp?
I'm a man but I hate patriarchy.
chouchou
(2,654 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,511 posts)... It's gotta be in here somewhere, hang on a sec ...