General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Biggest Health-Care Price Spike in Decades Is Imminent -- And the Media Is Ignoring It
The Biggest Health-Care Price Spike in Decades Is Imminent And the Media Is Ignoring It - MediaiteA young worker earning $35,000 who paid $80 per month will now pay $300 per month. Thats groceries. Thats rent.
These examples, reported by the New York Times based on figures from KFF, arent because hospitals suddenly cost more. Not because insurers got greedier. Its because Congress let enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies expireand millions of Americans are about to get the bill.
Health-care premiums are about to detonate and were all staring at the wrong explosion. While Washington and the press corps are hypnotized by the 31-day government shutdown and... Donald Trumps insistence that he has a better, cheaper health-care plan on an invisible clipboard, millions of Americans are about to learn what happens when political sabotage meets media inattention: they get a bill.
Faux pas
(15,991 posts)that shit. The public will find out soon enough and then they can rise up against the chicken shit slacker media that kept them in the dark.
Silent Type
(11,722 posts)not by much.
B.See
(7,208 posts)seen coverage of it in certain outlets. But if what the author is saying is, it isn't receiving the coverage it should, I'd have to agree.
And the ending of SNAP benefits, as well as the shutdown and people not getting paid is the direct result of paid REPUBLICANS shutting down the House...
and for more reason than just healthcare I think.
Some might pooh pooh the harm that will result, but I guess we'll find out, won't we?
W_HAMILTON
(9,753 posts)AZJonnie
(2,028 posts)And their premiums are not "about to detonate". The premiums will be close to what they have always been (I mean, they go up almost every year, but that's not about to suddenly change).
What recipients of the subsidies pay themselves, out of pocket, to cover those premiums is what is going to explode. Specifically, for those people getting the subsidies. For everyone else, there's not going to be anything but the normal, ever-slowly-increasing pattern we see every year. At least I've read no analysis showing that's not the case, but I could've missed the news
B.See
(7,208 posts)contains a link of its own, to the NY Times article it cites.
Here's a link:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/10/30/upshot/obamacare-subsidies-new-prices.html
AZJonnie
(2,028 posts)I know our 'side' probably needs to simplify things for broader consumption and that the reich-wing is much better at doing so than we are and may be why they're having success selling their terrible ideas in contrast to our excellent, reality and fact-based ideas.
Still, imprecise presentation always gets on my nerves. I know it's a personal problem, and I didn't mean for it to sound like it was directed at you, I know you're only the messenger, friend
B.See
(7,208 posts)there's only so much information one can present. So I don't mind pointing the way to additional references.
leftstreet
(37,855 posts)...or Medicare, SSI, Veterans Tricare, etc
It won't be until employee-based share of premiums cause people to rebel
Prairie Gates
(6,645 posts)the ACA was also a scheme to subsidize insurers.
leftstreet
(37,855 posts)Prairie Gates
(6,645 posts)Next year's will be massive for everybody if the millions on the ACA dump the whole system. United Health Care's profits doubled since the ACA, at least. What happens when that money leaves the system?
BannonsLiver
(19,882 posts)And as tools of the regime they will either not cover or both sides anything that could be construed as negative to the regime. Thats why Trumps dementia addled confusion in Japan was not covered at all.
B.See
(7,208 posts)the op in showing the NEGATIVE impact to out of pocket costs to consumers due to Trump/MAGA's mean-spirited legislation and obstructionism.
If that were not the case I wouldn't have mentioned them.
BannonsLiver
(19,882 posts)Prairie Gates
(6,645 posts)I just took a look at my open enrollment. Hoo wee. With millions of people about to abandon the plans, who do you think that's going to fall on? Part of the ACA was always to subsidize the actual insurance companies (which is why it is bad legislation, ultimately, relative to a single-payer system); that goes away, too. Are they going to eat the loss, or pass it on to employers and employees? They're already passing it on is the answer. And expect it to balloon in the 2026 open enrollment period if this doesn't get sorted.
leftstreet
(37,855 posts)If I remember correctly? If employer insurance is deemed unaffordable (by some metric) you can access the ACA markets. And now that coverage isn't mandatory, a lot of people will just opt out. Seems kinda hmm....
Prairie Gates
(6,645 posts)Tra la, the whole system will collapse because of greed, just like we always said...
BigmanPigman
(54,246 posts)That is 33% of my income after taxes and I live in Southern CA which is very expensive.
tRump's agenda is to bankrupt then kill is. I'm NOT joking!
B.See
(7,208 posts)We wish it weren't so, but such is the MALEVOLENT nature of what Trump and his MAGA party are trying to do, dismissals to the contrary, notwithstanding.
CRUELTY IS, FIRST AND FOREMOST, THEIR OBJECTIVE.
Thanks for putting into focus what's happening to REAL people, in REAL terms.
BigmanPigman
(54,246 posts)Cha
(315,380 posts)see how they like the "ratings".